logo Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
2023-02-06 04:07:36 CoV Wiki
Learn more about the Church of Virus
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Open for business: The CoV Store!

  Church of Virus BBS
  General
  Evolution and Memetics

  Poll reveals public doubts over Charles Darwin's theory of evolution
previous next
Pages: [1] Reply Notify of replies Send the topic Print 
   Author  Topic: Poll reveals public doubts over Charles Darwin's theory of evolution  (Read 2735 times)
David Lucifer
Archon
*****

Posts: 2641
Reputation: 8.96
Rate David Lucifer



Enlighten me.

View Profile WWW E-Mail
Poll reveals public doubts over Charles Darwin's theory of evolution
« on: 2009-02-02 13:47:40 »
Reply with quote

source: Telegraph
Belief in creationism is widespread in Britain, according to a new survey.

By Jonathan Wynne-Jones, Religious Affairs Correspondent

More than half of the public believe that the theory of evolution cannot explain the full complexity of life on Earth, and a "designer" must have lent a hand, the findings suggest.

And one in three believe that God created the world within the past 10,000 years.

The survey, by respected polling firm ComRes, will fuel the debate around evolution and creationism ahead of next week's 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin.

Richard Dawkins, the evolutionary biologist and author of The God Delusion, said the findings revealed a worrying level of scientific ignorance among Britons.

In the survey, 51 per cent of those questioned agreed with the statement that "evolution alone is not enough to explain the complex structures of some living things, so the intervention of a designer is needed at key stages"

A further 40 per cent disagreed, while the rest said they did not know.
The suggestion that a designer's input is needed reflects the "intelligent design" theory, promoted by American creationists as an alternative to Darwinian evolution.

Asked whether it was true that "God created the world sometime in the last 10,000 years", 32 per cent agreed, 60 per cent disagreed and eight per cent did not know.

The findings to be published tomorrow in a report by Theos, a theology think-tank follow a row over the place of creationism in education.

A recent poll of science teachers found that one in three believe creationism should be taught in science classes alongside evolution and the Big Bang theory of the origin of the universe.

However, Michael Reiss, a biologist and Anglican cleric, was forced to resign as the Royal Society's director of education after suggesting that creationism should be discussed in lessons "not as a misconception but as a world view".

Speaking at the British Association Festival of Science at the University of Liverpool last year, Professor Reiss estimated that about one in 10 children was from a family which supported a creationist rather than evolutionary viewpoint.

He said his experience had led him to believe it was more effective to include discussion about creationism alongside scientific theories, rather than simply giving the impression that such children were wrong.

The research for Theos shows that the level of support for creationism is much higher than Professor Reiss's estimation, but also indicates that many people who believe in God also consider evolution to be the most realistic explanation for the origins of living things.

Paul Woolley, the director of Theos said: "Darwin is being used by certain atheists today to promote their cause.

"The result is that, given the false choice of evolution or God, people are rejecting evolution."

While many fundamentalist Christians believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible's account of the earth's creation, the Church of England last year issued a statement conceding it had been over-defensive in dismissing Darwin's ideas in the past.

The Church launched a website promoting the naturalist's evolutionary views on which it said: "Charles Darwin: 200 years from your birth, the Church of England owes you an apology for misunderstanding you and, by getting our first reaction wrong, encouraging others to misunderstand you still."

Prof Dawkins expressed dismay at the findings of the ComRes survey, of 2,060 adults, which he claimed were confirmation that much of the population is "pig-ignorant" about science.

"Obviously life, which was Darwin's own subject, is not the result of chance," he said.

"Any fool can see that. Natural selection is the very antithesis of chance.

"The error is to think that God is the only alternative to chance, and Darwin surely didn't think that because he himself discovered the most important non-theistic alternative to chance, namely natural selection."

Lord Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, accused Dawkins of evolving into a "very simple kind of thinker".

He said: "His argument for atheism goes like this: either God is the explanation for the wide diversity of biological life, or evolution is. We know that evolution is true. Therefore, God doesn't exist. [Obviously Dawkins said nothing of the sort --Lucifer]

"I'm an evangelical Christian, but I have no difficulties in believing that evolution is the best scientific account we have for the diversity of life on our planet."
« Last Edit: 2009-02-02 13:51:32 by David Lucifer » Report to moderator   Logged
Blunderov
Archon
*****

Gender: Male
Posts: 3160
Reputation: 8.93
Rate Blunderov



"We think in generalities, we live in details"

View Profile WWW E-Mail
Re:Poll reveals public doubts over Charles Darwin's theory of evolution
« Reply #1 on: 2009-02-03 01:30:01 »
Reply with quote


Quote from: David Lucifer on 2009-02-02 13:47:40   
Lord Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, accused Dawkins of evolving into a "very simple kind of thinker".

He said: "His argument for atheism goes like this: either God is the explanation for the wide diversity of biological life, or evolution is. We know that evolution is true. Therefore, God doesn't exist. [Obviously Dawkins said nothing of the sort --Lucifer]

"I'm an evangelical Christian, but I have no difficulties in believing that evolution is the best scientific account we have for the diversity of life on our planet."



[Blunderov] Ah the infamous false dichotomy! He accuses Dawkins of having become a simple thinker without, apparently, being at all aware of his own elementary fallacy. A ranking Bishop really should know better - but perhaps he is deliberately perpetrating a sophistry. Probably he is. The only refuge these intellectual scoundrels now have against the wholesale destruction that Dawkins has wrought on their traditional arguments for the existence of "God" is to claim that these (which are stories for the hoi polloi only; a "simple" people) are not in fact the actual real arguments. These arguments, they sometimes go on to say, are simply too complex to be understood by those who are too stubborn to accept as an original premise that the argument must be true. What a pantload.

Quite "simply" the Judeo-Christian Sky-Daddy does not exist quod erat demonstrandum.
« Last Edit: 2009-02-03 01:32:29 by Blunderov » Report to moderator   Logged
localroger
Magister
**

Gender: Male
Posts: 44
Reputation: 6.53
Rate localroger



Never!

View Profile E-Mail
Re:Poll reveals public doubts over Charles Darwin's theory of evolution
« Reply #2 on: 2010-11-18 19:22:16 »
Reply with quote

Well at least I'm glad it just isn't in the USA that people are this stupid.
Report to moderator   Logged
MoEnzyme
Acolyte
*****

Gender: Male
Posts: 2256
Reputation: 4.76
Rate MoEnzyme



infidel lab animal

View Profile WWW
Re:Poll reveals public doubts over Charles Darwin's theory of evolution
« Reply #3 on: 2010-11-18 23:50:49 »
Reply with quote


Quote from: localroger on 2010-11-18 19:22:16   

Well at least I'm glad it just isn't in the USA that people are this stupid.

I'm saddened no matter where such stupidity occurs. I wish it on no nation.
Report to moderator   Logged

I will fight your gods for food,
Mo Enzyme


(consolidation of handles: Jake Sapiens; memelab; logicnazi; Loki; Every1Hz; and Shadow)
kenneth
Neophyte
**

Posts: 34
Reputation: 0.00



I'm a llama!

View Profile E-Mail
Re:Poll reveals public doubts over Charles Darwin's theory of evolution
« Reply #4 on: 2010-11-28 11:22:01 »
Reply with quote

[[ author reputation (0.00) beneath threshold (3)... display message ]]

Report to moderator   Logged
kenneth
Neophyte
**

Posts: 34
Reputation: 0.00



I'm a llama!

View Profile E-Mail
Re:Poll reveals public doubts over Charles Darwin's theory of evolution
« Reply #5 on: 2011-01-09 05:57:17 »
Reply with quote

[[ author reputation (0.00) beneath threshold (3)... display message ]]

Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1] Reply Notify of replies Send the topic Print 
Jump to:


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Church of Virus BBS | Powered by YaBB SE
© 2001-2002, YaBB SE Dev Team. All Rights Reserved.

Please support the CoV.
Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS! RSS feed