2011-03-13 11:00:11
| #virus from 2011-03-13 11::00 (showing messages 1-300) Bookmark the permanent url.
|
11:00:11 | Lucifer | I have to bug out before noon cause some people are coming to look at the house |
11:00:16 | Sat | "objective" or subjective time? |
11:00:27 | Sat | Because for me it doesn't start for an hour. |
11:00:34 | Sat | * Sat nods |
11:00:41 | Lucifer | Welcome to the Virus weekly chat! |
11:00:46 | Lucifer | first one in almost 4 years |
11:00:57 | Sat | * Sat appluads politely |
11:00:57 | Lucifer | today's topic was suggested by Sat |
11:01:04 | Lucifer | Dominion Theory |
11:01:29 | Sat | the 4 year isn't completely accurate. we used to chat in SL |
11:02:12 | Lucifer | ok, 4 years since the last archived chat |
11:02:54 | Lucifer | which also took place in SL |
11:02:58 | Sat | So, ya. Anyhow. Back in the day Lucifer and I were speculating about virtual worlds post-singularity, and we came up with dominion theory. |
11:03:16 | Lucifer | so what is the basic idea? |
11:03:34 | Lucifer | I envision a future that contains a multitude of virtual worlds |
11:04:00 | Lucifer | Everyone that is online will have the ability to create their own world with their own rules |
11:04:02 | MoEnzyme | * MoEnzyme has returned |
11:04:12 | Sat | I seem to remember the essence being that one could create worlds which for all purposes are real, and each world would have it's own rules. |
11:04:23 | Lucifer | * Lucifer nods |
11:04:26 | Lucifer | wb Mo |
11:04:32 | Sat | Within those worlds one would be bound by the rules, etc. |
11:04:52 | Sat | I also remember thinking of a dominion as an extension of one's own psyche, in a sense |
11:05:28 | Lucifer | Dominions will compete for people to visit |
11:05:34 | MoEnzyme | Perhaps then we should call it "virtural cominion theory", to distinguish it from dominionism. |
11:05:39 | Sat | For me the idea is inspired by the LaVeyan idea of total environments and Localroger's PI novel. |
11:05:43 | Lucifer | but visitors will have to play be rules or be banished |
11:06:17 | Lucifer | You can call it what you like, Mo |
11:06:18 | MoEnzyme | "virtual dominion theory" even. |
11:06:21 | Sat | and rules could include things like once you enter you cannot leave "alive." |
11:06:36 | Lucifer | There are dozens of uses of "dominion" |
11:06:39 | MoEnzyme | * MoEnzyme likes "virtual dominion theory" |
11:07:06 | Sat | The interesting thing about dominion theory is how it could be used to illustrate relativity in ethics |
11:07:16 | Lucifer | * Lucifer nods |
11:07:32 | Sat | well that and being the god of a reality. |
11:07:33 | Lucifer | Dominions allow like-minded people to associate |
11:07:39 | MoEnzyme | The Church of Virus BBS is a kind of dominion then, right? |
11:07:44 | Sat | * Sat nods |
11:07:45 | MoEnzyme | Lucifer's dominion even. |
11:07:49 | Sat | a low res dominion |
11:08:00 | Lucifer | yes, it could be considered a proto-dominion |
11:08:01 | MoEnzyme | Because he can banish people who spam his BBS. |
11:08:07 | Lucifer | like almost any online community |
11:08:35 | Lucifer | so one way to think about it is what is the future of online communities given current trends |
11:08:48 | Sat | One way to think of Dominions as we envisioned them is online communities with such advanced tech that they become alternate realities. |
11:08:55 | MoEnzyme | I mean of course Lucifer is just one of many Archons whom he may consult with, but unltimately he is the administrator so it's his dominion. |
11:09:11 | Lucifer | and I think current trends point to VRs like SecondLife and MMORPGs |
11:09:43 | MoEnzyme | Well, is there any reason that it has to be limited to VRs like these? |
11:09:55 | Sat | No actually not. |
11:10:12 | MoEnzyme | Couldn't any online social networking site be a dominion? |
11:10:19 | MoEnzyme | Like Facebook for example. |
11:10:21 | Sat | Fetishistic role play could be another type of primative dominion manifestation |
11:10:41 | Lucifer | MoEnzyme, I think that would dilute the concept |
11:11:04 | Sat | The analogy is apt. Participants agree on rules beforehand, and push the envelope within them. |
11:11:14 | MoEnzyme | hmmm, okay so that's a bit different from what Sat said. |
11:11:30 | Sat | The rules may or may not match very well with "normal" ethics and behaviour. |
11:11:49 | MoEnzyme | So Church of Virus is a dominion and Facebook isn't. Is that the line? |
11:11:49 | Lucifer | right, you could dilute it further to include football games |
11:11:59 | Sat | But within the Dominion it is consistent. |
11:12:12 | Lucifer | I would not include CoV as it is today |
11:12:21 | Sat | The CoV could be considered a proto-dominion like a biological virus is an organism. |
11:12:22 | MoEnzyme | Why not the CoV? |
11:12:28 | Lucifer | CoV is not a VR |
11:12:46 | MoEnzyme | Ah, so it DOES have to be a Virtual Reality. |
11:13:05 | MoEnzyme | off line football games, and BDSM are not Virtual. |
11:13:05 | Sat | I'd say the tech is irrelevant. |
11:13:33 | Sat | It has to be a reality, whether it's virtual, advanced tech, or a ritual, or roleplay. |
11:13:34 | Lucifer | I'm willing to consider other definitions |
11:14:16 | Sat | Obviously the extension of the idea is to when tech is so advanced that virtual worlds and real worlds aren't different in a meaningful way |
11:14:19 | MoEnzyme | what about a text based VR . . . like the old MUUDs? |
11:14:31 | Lucifer | but I'm reluctant to expand the definition so much it becomes meaningless |
11:14:41 | Sat | well all those things are like analogies MO. |
11:14:56 | Sat | Imagine for a moment that what we think of as reality is in fact a sim. |
11:15:07 | Sat | We are in the Universe Dominion |
11:15:19 | Lucifer | using my current definition there are no dominions yet |
11:15:28 | Sat | Within this Dominion there are natural laws we must obey. |
11:15:45 | MoEnzyme | Oh OK. So a Second Life sim wouldn't count either. |
11:16:10 | Sat | Lucifer and I posit a time in the future where anyone could create a sim that would be for all intents and purposes an alternate reality |
11:16:20 | Lucifer | * Lucifer nods |
11:16:23 | Sat | that would be a Dominion |
11:16:24 | MoEnzyme | So perhaps we can view the CoV BBS and Facebook as proto-dominions since there are no dominions yet. |
11:16:39 | MoEnzyme | * MoEnzyme nods |
11:17:01 | Sat | Well perhaps not-proto Dominions, but maybe having elements of dominion. |
11:17:48 | Sat | Imagine what world you would create if you were God. |
11:17:59 | MoEnzyme | Okay, so still we can use social networking sites, the CoV BBS, and Second Life as proto-dominions in order to theorize about how future dominions will work since there aren't any real dominions yet. |
11:18:00 | Sat | That world would be your dominion. |
11:18:08 | Sat | * Sat nods |
11:18:12 | MoEnzyme | or at least no real virtual dominions yet. |
11:18:52 | MoEnzyme | Okay that makes some since. |
11:18:55 | Sat | Yes and to that I would also add examples of sexual roleplay and satanic ritual. |
11:19:03 | Lucifer | Would you want to create a dominion that attracted a large number of visitors? |
11:19:33 | Sat | Personally no. |
11:19:36 | MoEnzyme | I guess it depend on what you wanted to do with your dominion. What counts as a large number of visitors? |
11:19:49 | Lucifer | I'm guessing we will see large variation in accessibility as well |
11:20:00 | Sat | My dominion would act more like a strange attractor for like minded entities. |
11:20:10 | Lucifer | lots of mainstream dominions, but many more niche ones |
11:20:32 | Sat | and a lot of downright scary ones depending on one's own mind |
11:20:54 | Sat | There will be pedo play dominions, etc. |
11:21:03 | Lucifer | * Lucifer nods |
11:21:21 | Lucifer | So will some types of dominions be illegal? |
11:21:36 | Sat | By today's primative standards yes. |
11:21:51 | Lucifer | I suggest that no dominions should be illegal because visiting is always voluntary |
11:21:55 | MoEnzyme | well, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar's_number sets a typical person's community of influence at about 150 individuals. |
11:21:56 | Sat | But I think when dominions are possible legality will be moot. |
11:22:06 | Sat | exactly Lucifer |
11:22:21 | MoEnzyme | So perhaps that might have some bearing on what social size you will want your dominion to hold. |
11:22:39 | Sat | That number Mo, is for primative meatspace. |
11:22:54 | Sat | In todays online communities one has far greater influence |
11:23:14 | Lucifer | agreed, there are already online communities with far greater numbers |
11:23:26 | MoEnzyme | Sat, true, but it relates to the capacity of the human neocortex to handle social relations whether they are IRL or virtual. |
11:23:27 | Sat | But I think the numbers are irrelevant, unless one is into competing in that manner. |
11:23:49 | Sat | By the time we have dominion we will have shed our meat. |
11:23:50 | MoEnzyme | Not so much about meatspace as it is about cognitive capacity. |
11:24:05 | MoEnzyme | Sat, including our brains? |
11:24:07 | Lucifer | So I've been assuming that visiting a dominion is always voluntary, it that a safe assumption? |
11:24:14 | Sat | We will be cyber-organisms. |
11:24:25 | Sat | That's how I envision it Lucifer. |
11:24:50 | Sat | I also envision that you won't be able to get into just any dominion based on desire to be there. |
11:25:01 | Sat | Your very match would have to match the dominion. |
11:25:05 | MoEnzyme | Well, if we have to wait until we are completely uploaded into computers and no longer even have brains anymore, that could be a bit too far out to even theorize about. |
11:25:06 | Sat | mind^ |
11:25:11 | Sat | very mind^ |
11:25:32 | Lucifer | I agree with Sat about matching |
11:25:41 | Lucifer | I disagree with Sat about needing to shed our meat first |
11:26:14 | MoEnzyme | Okay so Lucifer and I are in agreement that it should at least be based on our current neural capacity somehow. |
11:26:26 | MoEnzyme | at least in terms of social network sizes. |
11:26:39 | Lucifer | I think we will have very convincing VR before mind-uploading |
11:26:41 | Sat | I guess my idea of Dominions is taken to an extreme. I envision them as choosing realities and being bound by that choice. |
11:27:09 | MoEnzyme | I agree with that last comment, Lucifer. |
11:27:27 | Sat | Like assuming our current reality is a Dominion we chose to play in and we are bound to do so until we 'die.' |
11:28:03 | Lucifer | if we do get mind-uploading tech, then dominions will maybe be inevitable |
11:28:20 | MoEnzyme | Certainly convincing VR may allow for some very large communities, however just like IRL communities they will have to work withing the cognitive capacities of the human brain. |
11:28:25 | Sat | Assume for a moment you are actually a being of immense god-like power. Perhaps it would be fun to play at being mortal. |
11:28:35 | MoEnzyme | Hence my invoking Dunbars number http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar's_number |
11:28:46 | Sat | So you sin off a thread to live the life you live now. fully bound by the rules of this game. |
11:29:03 | Sat | That's an example of one Dominion. |
11:29:37 | MoEnzyme | Certainly the "God" of the dominion may have a dominion with thousands or even millions of people within the dominion, but there is no way for that God to have a personal relationship with everyone in that dominion. |
11:29:52 | Lucifer | I think the idea of God choosing to live a mortal life is a common trope in fiction and mythology |
11:29:53 | Sat | Well Mo. Our reality has 6 billion or so players |
11:30:00 | MoEnzyme | Perhaps he/she will delegate some, of course, but there are social limits. |
11:30:10 | Sat | we don't have to know all the players in a dominion to play within it. |
11:30:24 | MoEnzyme | Sat, yes, true, but there is no one dominion master god thingy over all 6 billion people. |
11:30:29 | MoEnzyme | actually 7 billion now. |
11:30:43 | Sat | well what if the universe itself is the dominion master |
11:30:50 | Sat | the reality enforces the rules |
11:30:57 | MoEnzyme | Right, Sat. It's just a question of the social tastes of the dominion players. |
11:32:20 | Lucifer | I think we can assume there will be wide variances in preferences that are accomodated by equally wide variances in dominions |
11:32:30 | Sat | * Sat nods |
11:32:41 | Lucifer | Can we make any generalizations that are more specific? |
11:32:57 | Sat | In fact Dominions could be self organizing realities based on mind's affinities. |
11:33:04 | Sat | Shared tastes or beliefs |
11:33:08 | Lucifer | What will all dominions have in common? I suggested that all will have voluntary membership. |
11:33:53 | MoEnzyme | Right, that would be different from the dominion of the entire world (7billion) since we don't have any choice of a different world. |
11:33:57 | Sat | My Dominion might be like the Hotel California... you can check in any time you like, but you can never leave. |
11:33:59 | Sat | * Sat grins |
11:34:00 | Lucifer | * Lucifer nods |
11:34:33 | Lucifer | No dominions will allow visitors to break the rules |
11:34:34 | MoEnzyme | Sat, could you try it out before deciding to join? |
11:34:55 | MoEnzyme | Lucifers question is similar to my mine. |
11:35:00 | Sat | Probably not Mo. |
11:35:19 | Lucifer | Or maybe rule-breaking will have automatic consequences |
11:35:22 | MoEnzyme | Okay, so Sat will probably have a smaller dominion than many. |
11:35:28 | Sat | * Sat grins |
11:35:41 | Sat | I'd have many dominions as I had selves |
11:36:08 | Sat | some dominions would be shared with others, like a LuciSat dominion based on the shared intersection of our minds |
11:36:19 | Lucifer | Some rules will be enforced like physics (no choice in the matter), some by convention and/or consequences |
11:37:02 | MoEnzyme | How many players does Sat envision in his dominion? |
11:37:15 | Sat | I think it's interesting to use the Universe as a Dominion example. If I assume it is I don't have to assume all humans are real. |
11:37:39 | Sat | This could in fact be my Dominion, and maybe 150 players are real |
11:37:41 | Lucifer | I would expect it to be impossible to harm others in many if not most dominions |
11:37:46 | Sat | the rest could be NPCs. |
11:37:51 | MoEnzyme | * MoEnzyme predicts Sat's dominion size at less than 200 |
11:38:16 | MoEnzyme | Ah okay. That sounds like a workable Sat universe. |
11:39:13 | Lucifer | Let's use "friend" to mean someone you have a friendly relationship with |
11:39:15 | MoEnzyme | Could people take a vacation from your dominion? Like check out for a week only? |
11:39:19 | Sat | Lucifer. I'm thinking we will naturally gravitate to and participate in the Dominions most suited to our minds. |
11:39:30 | Lucifer | How many friends do you really want given that you have finite attention? |
11:39:38 | Sat | Explicit contractual agreements would be uneeded in such a case |
11:40:16 | Sat | the dominions would only have to allow those in who have mind signatures suited to the dominion. |
11:40:54 | Lucifer | I'll have to think about "mind signatures" |
11:41:03 | Sat | your mind print |
11:41:05 | Sat | ? |
11:41:14 | Sat | your OS! |
11:41:16 | Sat | heh |
11:41:30 | MoEnzyme | Well I would think that if you wanted to attract people to your dominion especially if they can't check out, you might want to have some contractual understandings ahead of time before they join. Like a pre-nuptial agreement for a metaphorical example. |
11:41:49 | Lucifer | I don't think you can predict future behavior by examining the code |
11:41:57 | Sat | Lucifer as software only capable of running on platorms which are designed to work for him. |
11:42:06 | Lucifer | google: Turing halting problem |
11:42:07 | googlebot | googling for Turing halting problem |
11:42:07 | googlebot | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem |
11:43:03 | Sat | Well behaviourly it would work like life now. You aren't very likely to go to a christian church and want to stay there are you? |
11:43:18 | Sat | But there are a lot of christian minds that do. |
11:43:18 | Lucifer | true |
11:43:59 | Lucifer | So is the "mind signature" just a distillation of previous choices? |
11:44:07 | Sat | if you went to the church out of curiosity and there was a full disclosure before you entered... |
11:44:29 | Sat | stating that you could be forced to stay until the dominion master chose to release you... |
11:44:34 | Sat | would you eneter? |
11:44:42 | MoEnzyme | probably not. |
11:45:00 | MoEnzyme | but some people might. |
11:45:03 | Lucifer | Well I don't think I could ever be forced to stay |
11:45:36 | Sat | I posit dominions where you can be forced to stay, once you agree to the rules |
11:45:51 | Sat | because the dominion is in effect it's own ethical universe |
11:46:00 | Sat | once you enter you are bound by the rules |
11:46:17 | Lucifer | But you can always disconnect |
11:46:18 | MoEnzyme | What if the the cominion master is an Artificial Intelligence instead of a person in an embodied brain, would that make a difference? |
11:46:29 | Sat | Not if you've shed your meat. |
11:46:35 | MoEnzyme | or at least commit suicide, Lucifer. |
11:46:37 | Sat | That's why I took it to that stage |
11:47:00 | Sat | Mo perhaps the dominion could stimpulate reincarnation into the dominion |
11:47:18 | Lucifer | I think an AI would likely create a different sort of dominion, Mo |
11:47:22 | Sat | You would not be forced to play, but once you chose to, you'd be bound to. |
11:47:59 | Lucifer | I think the worst they can do is to prevent you from re-entering if you disconnect before they say you can |
11:48:19 | Sat | * Sat explored dominion theory while intensely chemically altered last Summer, actually. |
11:48:22 | MoEnzyme | Perhaps we could have special dominions for people found guilty of heinous crimes IRL. That could be involuntary. |
11:48:56 | MoEnzyme | Like OZ! :) |
11:48:57 | Sat | Well leave the meat behind for a moment and assume a stage of being where you are no longer meat. |
11:49:12 | Sat | If you can unplug, the rules of the world override those of dominion |
11:49:25 | Sat | and yes. there would be illegal dominions |
11:49:33 | Sat | and they would be shut down, etc |
11:49:53 | Sat | To me the idea of Dominions only makes sense when one is no longer corporal. |
11:50:06 | Lucifer | OK, in a world where a dominion can trap you, they can also trick you into entering |
11:50:15 | Sat | * Sat nods |
11:50:22 | Lucifer | that is a scary thought |
11:50:26 | Sat | Satan want your soul, Lucifer. |
11:50:30 | Lucifer | ieeee |
11:50:46 | Lucifer | alrightly I have to scoot |
11:50:51 | Sat | maybe some intelligences would want to collect other intelligences |
11:50:53 | Lucifer | excellent chat! |
11:50:58 | Lucifer | feel free to continue without me |
11:50:59 | MoEnzyme | okay good chat Lucifer. |
11:51:01 | MoEnzyme | Thanks. |
11:51:07 | Sat | to add processing power. |
11:51:13 | Lucifer | bbl |
11:51:14 | Lucifer | Lucifer is now known as LuciferAFK |
11:51:49 | MoEnzyme | * MoEnzyme is thinking even more strongly that this should be called "Virtual Dominion Theory". |
11:52:06 | MoEnzyme | Especially with Sat's desire to leave his meat behind ;) |
11:52:29 | Sat | In the trip I had last Summer, I had this enlightenment: This is a dominion. The reality I am in is one I trapped myself within. |
11:52:59 | Sat | Sure you could frame it all tech like, but the tech is just a part of the dominion I am trapped within. |
11:53:01 | MoEnzyme | Well it's different in that once the trip was over, the dominion disolves. |
11:53:05 | Sat | It was a very strange trip. |
11:53:32 | Sat | Well assume what you think is real is real... but it is a dominion. |
11:53:38 | Sat | That this is a sim. |
11:53:40 | MoEnzyme | It still makes some sense even when not chemically altered. I haven't smoked anything today myself. :) |
11:53:57 | Sat | That the meat isn't actually meat. |
11:54:05 | Sat | it is information. |
11:54:29 | Sat | Are you are a thread of a much vaster intelligence that is engaged in this reality. |
11:54:33 | MoEnzyme | right, it's information, but it's still limited by the hardware to some extent. |
11:54:43 | Sat | right. the rules of the dominion |
11:55:26 | MoEnzyme | So even if you were tripping (on LSD psylosibin or whatever) it was still going on in the meat-space of your brain. |
11:55:44 | Sat | See each dominion would in effect be a complete reality with rules it is impossible to break. |
11:56:15 | Sat | Or maybe one might be able to hack it a tad. |
11:56:34 | MoEnzyme | Well, we have just a few more minutes until the end of the hour. Any final thoughts? |
11:56:41 | Sat | Perhaps the pyschdelic trip was a 'program' to hack the sim. |
11:57:00 | MoEnzyme | * MoEnzyme nods |
11:57:27 | Sat | Well the main thought I have is that we tend to not extend the idea of dominion far enough to use it as a tool for philosophical exploration. |
11:57:29 | Sat | * Sat shrugs |
11:57:54 | MoEnzyme | Well, I think we made some progress at least from my point of view. |
11:58:02 | Sat | * Sat nods |
11:58:16 | Sat | I think it'd be stimulating to continue next week |
11:58:23 | MoEnzyme | I didn't know WTF you and Lucifer were talking about an hour ago, and now I feel like I at least have a starting point. |
11:58:29 | Sat | or outside official caht |
11:58:54 | Sat | well once we lay the foundation of dominion then we lay the foundatation of Q |
11:58:55 | MoEnzyme | My clock shows two more minutes :) |
11:59:00 | Sat | there see how they interact |
11:59:04 | Sat | then^ |
11:59:23 | MoEnzyme | Ah yes, that could be a good idea to incorporate into virtual dominion theory . . . Q |
11:59:27 | Sat | * Sat needs new porn |
12:00:11 | MoEnzyme | Perhaps we can have a scheduled chat about Q within Virtual Dominion Theory. |
12:00:26 | Sat | * Sat nods |
12:00:35 | Sat | well I'm going to get back to organizing the lair. |
12:00:40 | MoEnzyme | cool. |
12:00:44 | Sat | It was excellent having a 'real' chat |
12:00:51 | MoEnzyme | It was. |
12:01:01 | Sat | screw the politics |
12:01:03 | Sat | * Sat winks |
12:01:27 | MoEnzyme | * MoEnzyme , Sat and googlebot call Time for the end of the scheduled chat about "Virtual Dominion theory" |
12:01:29 | googlebot | I guess I kinda lost control, because in the middle of the play I ran up and lit the evil puppet villain on fire. No, I didn't. Just kidding. I just said that to help illustrate one of the human emotions, which is freaking out. Another emotion is greed, as when you kill someone for money, or something like that. Another emotion is generosity, as when you pay someone double what he paid for his stupid puppet. |
12:02:06 | MoEnzyme | alrighty . . . I'll be around off and on for a while. |
12:02:07 | Sat | feel free to post on the BBS so the outer circles of virus can get infected. |
12:02:14 | MoEnzyme | * MoEnzyme nods |
12:02:18 | MoEnzyme | I shall :) |
12:13:51 | Sat | oh one last Dominion thought. I do find resonance in the idea of a private dominion that only I can access, populated by my mind children. |
12:14:13 | Sat | A place with apects of myself would appear as spearate entities.... |
12:14:37 | Sat | aand my reality was unsullied by the minds, tatses, morals, and conventions of others. |
12:15:24 | Sat | A fully convincing reality where I could do whatever a I chose with complete privacy. |
12:16:06 | Sat | Now that's a frikkin dominion! |
12:22:50 | Sat | "Well it's different in that once the trip was over, the dominion disolves." Well actually the trip was not entering the dominion, but remembering I was in one. When the trip ended the rememberance faded and I was fully trapped within the universe again. |
12:22:53 | Sat | * Sat grins |
12:24:23 | Sat | ?me also proposes dominions were the contract for entry stipulates that while one is in the dominion one knows nothing else and does not know he is in a dominion. |
13:21:12 | MoEnzyme | I shall post the scheduled chat archive on the BBS within the next two hours. I'll edit for typos and mispellings only for the first posting, and offer Sat and Lucifer opportunities for other editing suggestions and afterthoughts at that point. In the next few days I'll post something more refined into the Doctrine Section. |
13:21:53 | MoEnzyme | Does "Virtual Dominion Theory" sound like a good name for the subject line? |
13:21:58 | MoEnzyme | to Sat? |
13:23:08 | Sat | I think the virtual is uneeded. |
13:23:22 | Sat | but it could be fun to abbreviate it as VD Theory |
13:23:27 | Sat | * Sat winks |
13:23:59 | MoEnzyme | So that is acceptable then? |
13:24:26 | Sat | I suppose. Lucifer seemed to like just using Dominion Theory. |
13:24:34 | Sat | I think the virtual is redundant. |
13:24:42 | Sat | but hey. you're a free agent |
13:24:59 | MoEnzyme | Okay, then I'll feel free. :) |
13:25:27 | MoEnzyme | Unless you would rather do the posting of course. |