2003-05-27 20:00:03
| #virus from 2003-05-27 20:00:00 (showing messages 1-30) Bookmark the permanent url.
|
20:00:03 | Tywick | hey shadow and rhino |
20:00:35 | Tywick | rhino I was wondering what convo you were refering to about my tat at the virian gathering |
20:00:48 | rhino | the pictures |
20:01:02 | rhino | lucifer posted a link to some pictures |
20:01:04 | Tywick | where are the pics at? |
20:01:10 | rhino | one of them featured your tatoo |
20:01:16 | Tywick | * Tywick tried to find them on the BBS |
20:01:31 | rhino | wait |
20:01:55 | Shadow | okay. ITS TIME. |
20:02:15 | Shadow | I don't know how much I can do on this topic, but I do have a first thought. |
20:02:34 | rhino | http://virus.lucifer.com/vf2003/ |
20:02:35 | Shadow | Why doesn't the matrix hypothesis violate Occams razor? |
20:02:46 | Sat | Sat (~santyr@[death to spam].1Cust178.tnt1.steamboat-springs.co.da.uu.net) has joined #virus |
20:02:46 | ChanServ | Mode change [+o Sat] on #virus by ChanServ |
20:02:51 | rhino | hey Sat |
20:03:00 | Sat | hi rhino |
20:03:06 | Tywick | erg part of my name is hiding in my pants |
20:03:16 | Sat | * Sat grins |
20:03:26 | rhino | well, Bostrom in this article uses somehow Fermi's Paradox in favor of the Matrix hypothesis |
20:03:44 | rhino | http://www.simulation-argument.com/matrix.html |
20:03:45 | Tywick | I think Lady Z's tat is better than mine |
20:03:55 | rhino | jealous? |
20:04:03 | Tywick | nah |
20:04:12 | Tywick | I plan on improving mine once I have $$$ |
20:04:26 | rhino | pasting Bostrom's argument |
20:04:27 | rhino | we should accept as true at least one of the following three propositions: |
20:04:27 | rhino | (1) The chances that a species at our current level of development can avoid going extinct before becoming technologically mature is negligibly small |
20:04:27 | rhino | (2) Almost no technologically mature civilisations are interested in running computer simulations of minds like ours |
20:04:27 | rhino | (3) You are almost certainly in a simulation. |
20:04:29 | rhino | Each of these three propositions may be prima facie implausible; yet, if the simulation argument is correct, at least one is true (it does not tell us which). |