Author
|
Topic: The Mediocrity Principle (Read 1927 times) |
|
David Lucifer
Archon
Posts: 2642
Reputation: 8.94
Rate David Lucifer
Enlighten me.
  
|
 |
The Mediocrity Principle
« on: 2011-01-18 10:27:50 » |
 |
source: Edge
author: PZ Myers
As someone who just spent a term teaching freshman introductory biology, and will be doing it again in the coming months, I have to say that the first thing that leapt to my mind as an essential skill everyone should have was algebra. And elementary probability and statistics. That sure would make my life easier, anyway — there's something terribly depressing about seeing bright students tripped up by a basic math skill that they should have mastered in grade school.
But that isn't enough. Elementary math skills are an essential tool that we ought to be able to take for granted in a scientific and technological society. What idea should people grasp to better understand their place in the universe?
I'm going to recommend the mediocrity principle. It's fundamental to science, and it's also one of the most contentious, difficult concepts for many people to grasp — and opposition to the mediocrity principle is one of the major linchpins of religion and creationism and jingoism and failed social policies. There are a lot of cognitive ills that would be neatly wrapped up and easily disposed of if only everyone understood this one simple idea.
The mediocrity principle simply states that you aren't special. The universe does not revolve around you, this planet isn't privileged in any unique way, your country is not the perfect product of divine destiny, your existence isn't the product of directed, intentional fate, and that tuna sandwich you had for lunch was not plotting to give you indigestion. Most of what happens in the world is just a consequence of natural, universal laws — laws that apply everywhere and to everything, with no special exemptions or amplifications for your benefit — given variety by the input of chance. Everything that you as a human being consider cosmically important is an accident. The rules of inheritance and the nature of biology meant that when your parents had a baby, it was anatomically human and mostly fully functional physiologically, but the unique combination of traits that make you male or female, tall or short, brown-eyed or blue-eyed were the result of a chance shuffle of genetic attributes during meiosis, a few random mutations, and the luck of the draw in the grand sperm race at fertilization.
Don't feel bad about that, though, it's not just you. The stars themselves form as a result of the properties of atoms, the specific features of each star set by the chance distribution of ripples of condensation through clouds of dust and gas. Our sun wasn't required to be where it is, with the luminosity it has — it just happens to be there, and our existence follows from this opportunity. Our species itself is partly shaped by the force of our environment through selection, and partly by fluctuations of chance. If humans had gone extinct 100,000 years ago, the world would go on turning, life would go on thriving, and some other species would be prospering in our place — and most likely not by following the same intelligence-driven technological path we did.
And if you understand the mediocrity principle, that's OK.
The reason this is so essential to science is that it's the beginning of understanding how we came to be here and how everything works. We look for general principles that apply to the universe as a whole first, and those explain much of the story; and then we look for the quirks and exceptions that led to the details. It's a strategy that succeeds and is useful in gaining a deeper knowledge. Starting with a presumption that a subject of interest represents a violation of the properties of the universe, that it was poofed uniquely into existence with a specific purpose, and that the conditions of its existence can no longer apply, means that you have leapt to an unfounded and unusual explanation with no legitimate reason. What the mediocrity principle tells us is that our state is not the product of intent, that the universe lacks both malice and benevolence, but that everything does follow rules — and that grasping those rules should be the goal of science.
|
|
|
|
|
MoEnzyme
Acolyte
Gender: 
Posts: 2256
Reputation: 4.55
Rate MoEnzyme
infidel lab animal
|
|
Re:The Mediocrity Principle
« Reply #1 on: 2011-01-18 20:01:28 » |
|
These are very good points. Intellectually, I think this stands as argument number one against American exceptionalism. I of course understand that the United States currently stands as the number one military superpower in the world today, and that for reasons connected to recent history (the aftermath of WWII and population size compared to natural resources) that we still have the most dynamically powerful economy in the world for the time being. And while it's important to recognize these factors, they do not in fact make us exceptional in terms of the mediocrity principle.
If we knew what was good for us, we would not be expecting or demanding to play by a different set of rules than the rest of of the world. After all no empire lasts forever, and ours remains still just a flash in the pan compared the lifespan of other empires in human history. If we furthermore had even an inkling of an idea what is good for the rest of the world, we'd be doubly reluctant to consider ourselves exceptional. After all, what is the rest of the world to think of a message that both says "We are fundamentally different from you", and "You should value the same things we do." It's a contradiction more easily seen from a foreigner's point of view, and one we should see more clearly for ourselves if we weren't so blinded by our delusions of American exceptionalism.
Perhaps the better point of view would be one based on vision - a vision of our exceptional mediocrity. Which is to say . . . we understand how recent history has given us exceptional world power status for the time being, but we recognize our place in the span of human history such that we also understand our mediocrities on such a visionary time frame as well. I would include the Canadians and Mexicans in this as a continental issue as well since our fates remain fundamentally bound together for the foreseeable future, plus it gives the US at least some local perspective to pull US out of our more narcissistic tendencies.
|
I will fight your gods for food,
Mo Enzyme
(consolidation of handles: Jake Sapiens; memelab; logicnazi; Loki; Every1Hz; and Shadow)
|
|
|
Fritz
Archon
Gender:
Posts: 1746
Reputation: 8.85
Rate Fritz
|
|
Re:The Mediocrity Principle
« Reply #2 on: 2011-01-18 22:10:59 » |
|
Quote from: MoEnzyme on 2011-01-18 20:01:28
These are very good points. Intellectually, I think this stands as argument number one against American exceptionalism. <snip>.... <snip>." It's a contradiction more easily seen from a foreigner's point of view, and one we should see more clearly for ourselves if we weren't so blinded by our delusions of American exceptionalism.
Perhaps the better point of view would be one based on vision - a vision of our exceptional mediocrity. Which is to say . . . we understand how recent history has given us exceptional world power status for the time being, but we recognize our place in the span of human history such that we also understand our mediocrities on such a visionary time frame as well. I would include the Canadians and Mexicans in this as a continental issue as well since our fates remain fundamentally bound together for the foreseeable future, plus it gives the US at least some local perspective to pull US out of our more narcissistic tendencies.
|
So the Asian and European people exploited the abundant resources of the American continent over the last 1000 years, after enough people took up residence here we do the exploitation of the natural resources and now we notice resources are running out and we are swimming in our own excrement we are looking for solutions, to maintain our past level of greed.
Seems to follow the Mediocrity model pretty well .....
We continue on like every other civilization has done on this planet till we die.
Cheers
Fritz .... Yes I'm bitter
PS: Great link Lucifer, I liked some of the other briefs as well.
|
Where there is the necessary technical skill to move mountains, there is no need for the faith that moves mountains -anon-
|
|
|
MoEnzyme
Acolyte
Gender:
Posts: 2256
Reputation: 4.55
Rate MoEnzyme
infidel lab animal
|
|
Re:The Mediocrity Principle
« Reply #3 on: 2011-01-19 00:33:37 » |
|
Quote from: Fritz on 2011-01-18 22:10:59
Quote from: MoEnzyme on 2011-01-18 20:01:28
These are very good points. Intellectually, I think this stands as argument number one against American exceptionalism. <snip>.... <snip>." It's a contradiction more easily seen from a foreigner's point of view, and one we should see more clearly for ourselves if we weren't so blinded by our delusions of American exceptionalism.
Perhaps the better point of view would be one based on vision - a vision of our exceptional mediocrity. Which is to say . . . we understand how recent history has given us exceptional world power status for the time being, but we recognize our place in the span of human history such that we also understand our mediocrities on such a visionary time frame as well. I would include the Canadians and Mexicans in this as a continental issue as well since our fates remain fundamentally bound together for the foreseeable future, plus it gives the US at least some local perspective to pull US out of our more narcissistic tendencies.
|
So the Asian and European people exploited the abundant resources of the American continent over the last 1000 years, after enough people took up residence here we do the exploitation of the natural resources and now we notice resources are running out and we are swimming in our own excrement we are looking for solutions, to maintain our past level of greed.
Seems to follow the Mediocrity model pretty well .....
We continue on like every other civilization has done on this planet till we die.
Cheers
Fritz .... Yes I'm bitter
PS: Great link Lucifer, I liked some of the other briefs as well.
|
I think we agree, so let's be bitter together! 
Your North American Brother,
-Mo
|
I will fight your gods for food,
Mo Enzyme
(consolidation of handles: Jake Sapiens; memelab; logicnazi; Loki; Every1Hz; and Shadow)
|
|
|
Fritz
Archon
Gender:
Posts: 1746
Reputation: 8.85
Rate Fritz
|
|
Re:The Mediocrity Principle
« Reply #4 on: 2011-01-19 01:26:07 » |
|
Quote from: MoEnzyme on 2011-01-19 00:33:37
I think we agree, so let's be bitter together!
Your North American Brother,
-Mo
|
Bitter Together !!!! Fritz
Source: Word Origin & History
bitter
O.E. biter "bitter, sharp, cutting, angry, cruel, embittered," from P.Gmc. *bitras- (cf. O.S. bitar , O.N. bitr , Du. bitter , O.H.G. bittar , Ger. bitter , Goth. baitrs "bitter"), from PIE base *bheid- "to split" (cf. O.E. bitan "bite;" see bite). Evidently the meaning drifted in prehistoric times from "biting, of pungent taste," to "acrid-tasting." Used figuratively in O.E. of states of mind and words. Phrase to the bitter end is attested from 1849. Related: Bitterly .
|
Where there is the necessary technical skill to move mountains, there is no need for the faith that moves mountains -anon-
|
|
|
|
Logged
