logo Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
2024-05-06 07:57:26 CoV Wiki
Learn more about the Church of Virus
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Open for business: The CoV Store!

  Church of Virus BBS
  Mailing List
  Virus 2004

  virus: terraforming mars
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Reply Notify of replies Send the topic Print 
   Author  Topic: virus: terraforming mars  (Read 3031 times)
simul
Adept
****

Gender: Male
Posts: 614
Reputation: 7.87
Rate simul



I am a lama.
simultaneous zoneediterik
View Profile WWW
Re: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #15 on: 2004-01-11 18:43:54 »
Reply with quote

Phase 1

Bacteria are the most advanced nanotech we have. 

The radiation will be greatly reduced as gasses are released by the spread of bacteria.  Arctic anaerobic bacteria can survive is dry conditions without air.

Genetic modifications to these species can be made to enhance their survival.

Phase 2

10 years of bacterial growth will have enriched the atmosphere.  Genetically modified lichen and some fungi will be able to survive.

Never underestimate the oxygen-producing power of trillions of genetically modified microorganisms!


---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

Report to moderator   Logged

First, read Bruce Sterling's "Distraction", and then read http://electionmethods.org.
Jukka E Isosaari
Neophyte
***

Posts: 106
Reputation: 0.00



I love YaBB SE!

View Profile
Re: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #16 on: 2004-01-12 18:05:45 »
Reply with quote

[[ author reputation (0.00) beneath threshold (3)... display message ]]

Report to moderator   Logged
demo@demo.com
Neophyte
*

Posts: 5
Reputation: 0.00



I have never logged in.

View Profile E-Mail
Re: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #17 on: 2004-01-12 22:02:08 »
Reply with quote

[[ author reputation (0.00) beneath threshold (3)... display message ]]

Report to moderator   Logged
michelle
Initiate
***

Gender: Female
Posts: 105
Reputation: 5.92
Rate michelle



Peace is knowing that the Dude abides.

View Profile WWW
RE: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #18 on: 2004-01-13 12:10:45 »
Reply with quote

[Pat] NO EXCUSES I´LL SEND I DO NOT WANT TO BE IN YOUR  & ALL OF YOUR
LIST

[Michelle] Interesting that this actually pissed someone off that
much...

I hadn't thought about the Bush-related political backside of this, I
thought he perhaps was just trying to be some glorious Kennedy-like
inspirational leader and thought he should round it out in science.
With biological sciences crippled by his outlawing of most stem cell
research and his pitifully anti-modern social goals, perhaps space was
the only place left for a clean and non-sinful scientific breakthrough.


The broader point of the article ("is mars ours?") made me think of how
difficult it is to protect natural processes.  We can't even all agree
to leave the lake under antarctica alone, even though there is potential
that merely sampling its waters could disrupt its alien (to us mammals)
life-balance.  If there is bacteria in water somewhere on mars, some
would say that means we should take it as a sign of viability and go
ahead and transport earth life there to seed.  But what about the unique
processes that might breed life totally unlike ours on that planet? 

So the question to me is not why are we seeing any support for this from
such a backward administration but what kind of steps are necessary for
truly acceptible evidence that we are not disturbing preexisting
processes of evolution?  What odds are good enough that we're not
destroying a potential intelligence with a right to evolve?  Or is that
ridiculous, do humans belong everywhere we can exist no matter what?



---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

Report to moderator   Logged

Beyond the gate of Experience flows the Way,
Which is ever greater and more subtle than the world.
Blunderov
Archon
*****

Gender: Male
Posts: 3160
Reputation: 8.90
Rate Blunderov



"We think in generalities, we live in details"

View Profile WWW E-Mail
RE: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #19 on: 2004-01-13 13:31:30 »
Reply with quote

Michelle Anderson
> [Pat] NO EXCUSES I´LL SEND I DO NOT WANT TO BE IN YOUR  & ALL OF YOUR
> LIST
>
> [Michelle] Interesting that this actually pissed someone off that
> much...
>
> I hadn't thought about the Bush-related political backside of this, I
> thought he perhaps was just trying to be some glorious Kennedy-like
> inspirational leader and thought he should round it out in science.
> With biological sciences crippled by his outlawing of most stem cell
> research and his pitifully anti-modern social goals, perhaps space was
> the only place left for a clean and non-sinful scientific
breakthrough.
>
>
> The broader point of the article ("is mars ours?") made me think of
how
> difficult it is to protect natural processes.  We can't even all agree
> to leave the lake under antarctica alone, even though there is
potential
> that merely sampling its waters could disrupt its alien (to us
mammals)
> life-balance.  If there is bacteria in water somewhere on mars, some
> would say that means we should take it as a sign of viability and go
> ahead and transport earth life there to seed.  But what about the
unique
> processes that might breed life totally unlike ours on that planet?
>
> So the question to me is not why are we seeing any support for this
from
> such a backward administration but what kind of steps are necessary
for
> truly acceptible evidence that we are not disturbing preexisting
> processes of evolution?  What odds are good enough that we're not
> destroying a potential intelligence with a right to evolve?  Or is
that
> ridiculous, do humans belong everywhere we can exist no matter what?

[Blunderov]
Hi Michelle. Happy New year.

If you are right, Bush may have misappraised  the ramifications of any
discovery that life existed on a different planet than ours.

Then again, maybe not - theology has probably survived worse in it's
time.

With regard to "evidence that we are not disturbing preexisting
processes of evolution" I have to wonder whether human intervention
could not itself qualify as a preexisting process of evolution? And
whether this thought is not an instance of that age old tendency of
humans to see ourselves as somehow separate from the rest of the
universe?

As in so much else, it seems to be a bit arbitrary as to quite where the
line in the sand should be drawn.

Also, it seems to me that your concern with whether "we're not
destroying a potential intelligence with a right to evolve" is similar
to the central question of the abortion issue. Possibly you would take a
similar stance on both these issues?

Best Regards


---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

Report to moderator   Logged
demo@demo.com
Neophyte
*

Posts: 5
Reputation: 0.00



I have never logged in.

View Profile E-Mail
Re: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #20 on: 2004-01-13 14:05:23 »
Reply with quote

[[ author reputation (0.00) beneath threshold (3)... display message ]]

Report to moderator   Logged
michelle
Initiate
***

Gender: Female
Posts: 105
Reputation: 5.92
Rate michelle



Peace is knowing that the Dude abides.

View Profile WWW
RE: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #21 on: 2004-01-14 11:16:49 »
Reply with quote

[Pat] ARE YOU INVITEING ME? OR WHAT?

[Michelle]  No.  Calm down.  If you want off the mailing list use the
instructions in the email you received when you joined.  I have no beef
with you.


---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

Report to moderator   Logged

Beyond the gate of Experience flows the Way,
Which is ever greater and more subtle than the world.
sun tzu
Neophyte
**

Posts: 51
Reputation: 0.00



I have never logged in.

View Profile E-Mail
Re:virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #22 on: 2004-01-14 16:34:04 »
Reply with quote

[[ author reputation (0.00) beneath threshold (3)... display message ]]

Report to moderator   Logged
michelle
Initiate
***

Gender: Female
Posts: 105
Reputation: 5.92
Rate michelle



Peace is knowing that the Dude abides.

View Profile WWW
RE: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #23 on: 2004-01-14 16:42:11 »
Reply with quote



> [Blunderov]
> Hi Michelle. Happy New year.
>
> If you are right, Bush may have misappraised  the ramifications of any

> discovery that life existed on a different planet than ours.
>
> Then again, maybe not - theology has probably survived worse in it's
> time.
>
> With regard to "evidence that we are not disturbing preexisting
> processes of evolution" I have to wonder whether human intervention
> could not itself qualify as a preexisting process of evolution? And
> whether this thought is not an instance of that age old tendency of
> humans to see ourselves as somehow separate from the rest of the
> universe?
>
> As in so much else, it seems to be a bit arbitrary as to quite where
> the line in the sand should be drawn.
>
> Also, it seems to me that your concern with whether "we're not
> destroying a potential intelligence with a right to evolve" is similar

> to the central question of the abortion issue. Possibly you would take

> a similar stance on both these issues?
>
> Best Regards
>

Ooo! Ooo!  I LOVE being challenged for consistency.  Hello to you,
Blunderov! 

I really like your point about our pride of separation.  That is quite a
bit of ego, you are right.  And we are a force of nature, just witness
what we've done on our own planet.  I posted this mainly for exactly
these questions, because I'm not committed either way.  I am concerned,
though, that our sphere of influence has outgrown our wisdom, but that's
more of an emotional response than a logical one, and could be used on
arguments like the abortion issue as well.  "Meddling in God's affairs"
or some such nonsense. 

The question really comes down to a "does might make right?" debate, and
while in nature might really does make right (at least on an
out-competing type evolutionary level), in society (both human and
non-human, like bands of primates or sea-mammal pods) ethical concerns
are given more weight.  Violations of the majority's ethics get you in
trouble.  In that context, the difference between the abortion question
and the colonization question seems to rely on the choice of the entity
burdened with nurture.  In human society there are 2 entities burdened
in the abortion question - the woman whose womb is being used and the
society that must extend the rights, priveleges and responsibilities to
the new being.  For the colonization question there may also be
considered 2 burdened parties - the earth societies who send our
planet's resources (humans, raw goods, money) to mars and mars itself,
whose raw goods would be used.  In the abortion debate, the raw material
provider has a voice.  Since mars has no more say in the matter than the
earth does in what we do here, I guess the ethical question has been
silenced. 

But what about the changing morals of society about the use of nature?
We continue to personify the earth in order to give it rights.
Corporations have rights.  Does a planet have rights?

Obviously I'm far from decided, personally...

Michelle


---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

Report to moderator   Logged

Beyond the gate of Experience flows the Way,
Which is ever greater and more subtle than the world.
michelle
Initiate
***

Gender: Female
Posts: 105
Reputation: 5.92
Rate michelle



Peace is knowing that the Dude abides.

View Profile WWW
RE: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #24 on: 2004-01-14 16:53:20 »
Reply with quote

Interesting side note from a friend of mine:

"I wouldn't say it's "ethical" nor would I say "unethical".  If it turns
out there is no life at all on mars, there's no real danger of
destroying it's ecosystem.  I don't think it's necessarily right or
wrong.  It's just something that's going to happen.  In one sense it
could be considered a good thing, because the terraforming of Mars would
require strict eco-responsibility, which might actually rub off on our
home planet."


---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

Report to moderator   Logged

Beyond the gate of Experience flows the Way,
Which is ever greater and more subtle than the world.
simul
Adept
****

Gender: Male
Posts: 614
Reputation: 7.87
Rate simul



I am a lama.
simultaneous zoneediterik
View Profile WWW
Re: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #25 on: 2004-01-14 18:09:53 »
Reply with quote

We don't “belong” anywhere.  We are where we are.  We go where we go.  The question is:  are we creating a humanity and society that we want? 

As long as we love our lives, are inspired, lit up and enthusiastic for life...then, IMHO, we're on a path of knowledge and love.

Here's an interesting theory:

Cancer isn't dangerous to the body until it metastasizes. 

Likewise, is life not-dangerous to the balance of the universe until it migrates to other planets?

Heh.

Not that I believe the analogy is accurate....
---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

Report to moderator   Logged

First, read Bruce Sterling's "Distraction", and then read http://electionmethods.org.
Walter Watts
Archon
*****

Gender: Male
Posts: 1571
Reputation: 8.89
Rate Walter Watts



Just when I thought I was out-they pull me back in

View Profile WWW E-Mail
Re: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #26 on: 2004-01-15 19:14:33 »
Reply with quote

Mars is an uninteresting planetary rock.

Money better spent would be on two or three spaced-based telescopes that use the advantage of our orbital planetary parallax plus optical
interferometry.

Bush is a fucking idiot.

If the Mars explorer Spirit had crashed, does anyone think Bush would be talking 1 billion a year for NASA?

What an opportunistic prick.

Walter

Erik Aronesty wrote:

> We don't “belong” anywhere.  We are where we are.  We go where we go.  The question is:  are we creating a humanity and society that we want?
>
> As long as we love our lives, are inspired, lit up and enthusiastic for life...then, IMHO, we're on a path of knowledge and love.
>
> Here's an interesting theory:
>
> Cancer isn't dangerous to the body until it metastasizes.
>
> Likewise, is life not-dangerous to the balance of the universe until it migrates to other planets?
>
> Heh.
>
> Not that I believe the analogy is accurate....
> ---
> To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

--

Walter Watts
Tulsa Network Solutions, Inc.

"Reminding you to help control the human population. Have your sexual partner spayed or neutered."


---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

Report to moderator   Logged

Walter Watts
Tulsa Network Solutions, Inc.


No one gets to see the Wizard! Not nobody! Not no how!
DrSebby
Adept
***

Gender: Male
Posts: 456
Reputation: 7.98
Rate DrSebby



...Oh, you smell of lambs!
18680476 18680476    dr_sebby drsebby
View Profile WWW E-Mail
Re: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #27 on: 2004-01-15 21:59:09 »
Reply with quote

...oh right Walter, like we cant see right through your self-centered
aspirations of amateur astronomy.  And by the way, until i see a "Walter"
candy bar on the market, i respectfully demand that you re-ass-ess what you
call an uninteresting rock.

...while were at it, i think maybe we should send a "walter rover" down to
tulsa to open up a can of whup-ass on your little "pharmaceutical"
operation.  followed up by a personal visit from the Bush-dawg hisself' to
give you some personal lovin' only a Yale cheerleader could offer up.

your friend;

DrSebby.
"Courage...and shuffle the cards".





----Original Message Follows----
From: Walter Watts <wlwatts@cox.net>
Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
To: virus@lucifer.com
Subject: Re: virus: terraforming mars
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:14:33 -0600

Mars is an uninteresting planetary rock.

Money better spent would be on two or three spaced-based telescopes that use
the advantage of our orbital planetary parallax plus optical
interferometry.

Bush is a fucking idiot.

If the Mars explorer Spirit had crashed, does anyone think Bush would be
talking 1 billion a year for NASA?

What an opportunistic prick.

Walter

Erik Aronesty wrote:

> We don't “belong” anywhere.  We are where we are.  We go where we go. 
The question is:  are we creating a humanity and society that we want?
>
> As long as we love our lives, are inspired, lit up and enthusiastic for
life...then, IMHO, we're on a path of knowledge and love.
>
> Here's an interesting theory:
>
> Cancer isn't dangerous to the body until it metastasizes.
>
> Likewise, is life not-dangerous to the balance of the universe until it
migrates to other planets?
>
> Heh.
>
> Not that I believe the analogy is accurate....
> ---
> To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to
<http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

--

Walter Watts
Tulsa Network Solutions, Inc.

"Reminding you to help control the human population. Have your sexual
partner spayed or neutered."


---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to
<http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

Report to moderator   Logged

"courage and shuffle the cards..."
Blunderov
Archon
*****

Gender: Male
Posts: 3160
Reputation: 8.90
Rate Blunderov



"We think in generalities, we live in details"

View Profile WWW E-Mail
RE: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #28 on: 2004-01-16 07:47:59 »
Reply with quote


[Blunderov] Seems a lot of people are wondering why Bush is so
interested in Mars. Do you suppose he thinks there might be oil there?

Best Regards



---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

Report to moderator   Logged
simul
Adept
****

Gender: Male
Posts: 614
Reputation: 7.87
Rate simul



I am a lama.
simultaneous zoneediterik
View Profile WWW
Re: virus: terraforming mars
« Reply #29 on: 2004-01-16 09:53:12 »
Reply with quote

He's hoping to get the Martian vote.
---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

Report to moderator   Logged

First, read Bruce Sterling's "Distraction", and then read http://electionmethods.org.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Reply Notify of replies Send the topic Print 
Jump to:


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Church of Virus BBS | Powered by YaBB SE
© 2001-2002, YaBB SE Dev Team. All Rights Reserved.

Please support the CoV.
Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS! RSS feed