logo Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
2021-04-10 07:38:10 CoV Wiki
Learn more about the Church of Virus
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Everyone into the pool! Now online... the VirusWiki.

  Church of Virus BBS
  Science & Technology

  Is it a new particle, or just a fluke?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Reply Notify of replies Send the topic Print 
   Author  Topic: Is it a new particle, or just a fluke?  (Read 620 times)

Gender: Male
Posts: 1746
Reputation: 8.84
Rate Fritz

View Profile WWW E-Mail
Is it a new particle, or just a fluke?
« on: 2011-04-08 19:14:26 »
Reply with quote

CNN just put out this story http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/04/08/particle.physics.tevatron/index.html?hpt=Sbin but the article below I found more information.



Interesting effect at the Tevatron hints at new physics

Source: Symmetry magazine
Author: Kathryn Grim
Date: 2011.03.18

Fermilab's Wilson Hall in the shape of a t, the symbol for the top quark.

Scientists at the Large Hadron Collider may be on the verge of discovering a new particle, according to mounting evidence from experiments at Fermilab’s Tevatron.

Judging by its behavior, it’s not the Higgs.

Scientists are finding signs of new physics through the study of a particle Fermilab physicists discovered at the Tevatron, the top quark.

When top quarks and their anti-particles, anti-top quarks, are created in particle collisions at the Tevatron, detectors note the direction in which they fly. Theory predicts that the particles will favor one direction slightly over the other, traveling that way about 5 percent of the time more.

However, in studies by the DZero collaboration and the CDF collaboration, the particles seemed to be picky 15 percent of the time. Top quarks went forward and anti-top quarks went backward. This month, the CDF collaboration announced results with an even larger asymmetry.

They also recently released a study in which top quarks and their partners showed this unexpected behavior almost half of the time in collisions above a certain energy.

“It’s really challenging for us to construct a convincing theory to explain this,” said theorist Susanne Westhoff, who presented on the subject at the Rencontres de Moriond conference on Wednesday. “All of the proposed explanations involve a new particle.”

Scientists think the cause of the unexpected asymmetry could be the interference of an undiscovered particle, one just heavy enough to go undetected by the Tevatron. If that’s true, experiments at the recently restarted Large Hadron Collider may be just weeks from collecting enough data to find it.

The Higgs particle would not have this kind of effect, said physicist Fabrizio Margaroli, CDF top quark group leader, who presented the experimental results at the conference.

In particle colliders, energy converts to mass to create heavy particles that haven’t been around in abundance in nature since moments after the big bang. The more energy a collider has, the more massive particles it can create. Scientists search for particles with certain masses by studying collisions with the corresponding energy.

If a new particle is affecting top and anti-top quark production, scientists should see greater effects in collisions closer to the energy at which the new particle is created. CDF physicists saw just that. In collisions above 450 GeV, top and anti-top quarks favored one direction over the other 48 percent of the time.

The Tevatron experiments did not have quite enough confidence in the measurements considering collisions at any energy to call what they saw evidence of a deviation from the expected. However, the study of collisions above 450 GeV is statistically significant enough to make the cut.

“At this point, things become really interesting,” Margaroli said. “People have a reason to be curious.”

The CDF and DZero experiments expect to announce updated results by this summer. If their findings are similar, the combined evidence from the two experiments could tell scientists with 99.9999 percent certainty that what they’re seeing is no fluke; new physics are most likely afoot.
Report to moderator   Logged

Where there is the necessary technical skill to move mountains, there is no need for the faith that moves mountains -anon-
Pages: [1] Reply Notify of replies Send the topic Print 
Jump to:

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Church of Virus BBS | Powered by YaBB SE
© 2001-2002, YaBB SE Dev Team. All Rights Reserved.

Please support the CoV.
Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS! RSS feed