>
> Your jibes about "support" are unfounded and simply reflect that you
> seem to be under a fundamental misunderstanding.
>
Yeah; the mistake of hoping you'd to support your assertions; you'd
rather attempt a sophistric end-around by relabeling them 'opinions', a
designation which you, again in classic Hermitian double-standard
fashion, fail to apply to anyone else's but yours.
>
> Opinion is one's own, and need not be supported, although a polite
> request might gain an explanation of why an opinion is held in order
> to allow somebody else the ability to evaluate it, and a failure to do
> so might lessen the regard for that opinion. On the other hand, to be
> rational, an assertion has to be supportable, and must be supported on
> request, in order for the asserter to retain any credibility. Due to
> your, by now renowned, inability to support your assertions, coupled
> with your liking for invective and special pleading for sympathy when
> it is returned, your credibility has, in my opinion, shrunk to
> nothing. (See here is an example of an opinion which is supported by
> providing the reasons why I hold it. But I didn't have to do that for
> it to be valid. Others can take it or leave it as they choose).
>
The opinion of credibilityless, mother-slllandering, own-words-denying
smegmanoggins such as yourself as to the credibility of others is, of
course, bereft of all value whatsoever.
>
> On the other hand, as an example, when I say you are a plagiarist, I
> am making an assertion. An assertion which I have supported in the [
> Re:Goering on War, Reply #12, 2003-03-13 ]
> (
http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=7;action=display;threadi> d=28070) thread and, of course, anyone can confirm the matter by
> simply examining the evidence of your posts. Now, had I not already
> provided referenced support - as was the case in my post on the same
> thread, at [ Re:Goering on War, Reply #10, 2003-03-12 ]
> (
http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=7;action=display;threadi> d=28070) I should have had to do so on request - or have lost my claim
> to both credibility and rationality.
>
Actually, where I do not post a link, I include the author of the piece, or
else it is not an essay, but a news story. And as has already been
remarked, one has only to google a phrase to access the original.
Everyone here knows that; you just refuse to acknowledge it, and
furthermore attempt to traffick in what you must believe to be the
gullibility and credulousness and amnesia of others in supposedly
forgetting this, even though it was someone else on the list who pointed
it out to you. You have lost all claim to both rationality and credibility,
and to intelligence besides.
>
> Now, when you make assertions about my intent, it is clear that you
> cannot support them. Thus your assertions are risable, deserve and
> will receive no response, but had my opinion of you not already been
> so low it can drop no further, you would have lost some respect. Had
> you simply provided your opinion, and founded it if politely requested
> to do so, it might have been accepted by those who think the sun
> emanates from your fundamental orrifice (somehow bypassing your head)
> and imagine that you might have a valid opinion about something, and
> ignored by those who, like me, think you are a fuckwit and that while
> you appear grossly opinionated, your opinions are worthless.
>
I will say again what I have said before; you would have to inestimably
rise in mu regard to be worthy or deserving of my contempt. And the
negative opinion of a mother-slandering, own-words-denying moron is
devoutly to be treasured. I pity those who are like you, if, as you seem
to assert, such execrable creature do indeed exist.
>
> Now, having established that, there is no "Pope of Virus" and I
> suggest that it is highly unlikely to happen anytime in the near
> future. So available evidence proves that your assetions are wrong.
> This would tend to reduce the value of your opinion in the eyes of any
> who might think it has one, not that I think that many such exist.
>
It certainly won't be for a lack of your trying that you do not occupy such
a Papacy, but because of the palace revolt, involving many of the
Hierarchs, that ensued when you tried.
>
> Finally, I am not attempting to suggest what "memetically inclined
> articles should and should not be posted here", your unsustainable
> assertions to the contrary. Nor have I ever done so or had any desire
> to do so. It is simply the case that the subject to which your link
> refered has been declared formally off-topic. Whether or not it has,
> as you suggest, and I would dispute, "memetic value" is irrelevant to
> the case. I have about as much wish to receive links to neocon
> articles as I wish to see them plastered all over my inbox. I am sure
> I speak for many when I say this. Which is why this topic was banned.
> Period. No matter what justifications you may attempt to trot out for
> it, and no matter how much you desire to slap everyone here bar just
> about me for ignoring you.
>
I realizre that, true to your totalitarian nature, you would prefer to censor
information so that nothing credible that disagrees with your sacrosanct
opinions is presented before the eyes of list members, but you won't get
your way there, either. And this is indeed a list in which the study of
real-world memetic conflicts, and the academic commentary emanating
from studys of them, should indeed be available to list members,
despite your bleating protestations to the contrary.
>
> And guess what? I too am now ignoring you. You may not have not left
> the CoV, despite numerous (and open) invitations. It has, through your
> actions, left you.
>
So now you equate yourself to the CoV? Megalomania, thy name is
Carlita. At least I may not have to suffer your gaseous rhetoric, bilous
fulminations and insufferable bloviations any longer.
> ----
> This message was posted by Hermit to the Virus 2003 board on Church of
> Virus BBS.
> <
http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=54;action=display;thread> id=28079> --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to
> <
http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <
http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
Author
Logged
