I vote for compete. The whole idea of "yo" is irrelevant; there is no basis for trying to form a religion around that which cannot be meaningfully spoken of or experienced. At the very least there is no functional difference between rejecting the existence of Yo and accepting it, at least as regards one's approach to reality and everyday life. As Wittgenstein said (and as is oft-quoted in these forums), "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent."
I vote for compete. The whole idea of "yo" is irrelevant; there is no basis for trying to form a religion around that which cannot be meaningfully spoken of or experienced. At the very least there is no functional difference between rejecting the existence of Yo and accepting it, at least as regards one's approach to reality and everyday life. As Wittgenstein said (and as is oft-quoted in these forums), "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent."
At this point I don't know enough about Yoism to dismiss it but I'm leaning toward's Perplextus's take on it. Plus the name is silly. I can't help but think that the Yo is one half of a yo-yo.
Now, we rush to the idea that a Creator God exist(ed) before the start of the known uniververse !? Oh, come on ! And that ' he', or ' what ' or ' something ' stood or is the virtuosic bias for the firm universes space- time momentum !?
Why can 't we just pure and simple accept the fact that Nature in all its depths, is just what it is and that the Big Bang, space/ time, the humanrace, morality, religion are part of Natures, what ever that is_ evolutionary dictionary !? Is it worth insisting upon this view anyway !,
Now that God, faith, belief, religion, etc is losing its grip on society and becomes more and more a matter of the private and the personal, voices are heard to level God _ something of the transcedental, something impossible to know_ solid outside the universe known to us !? That stands far from the now almost worldwide struggle for the ' Right Of Not- Believing '. Moslims all around the world, (Christians got their secularism) gather and get organized to form pressure groups and political platfoms to express their vision that Islam needs to modernise_ needs to become a religion of reason and freedom. Some go even further and step out of religion all together. They leave believing and Islam behind and begin to start thinking for themselves_ how hard it even is to develop a personal way of critical thinking !
And how do we stroke the idea that a Creator God stands outside the possibility of knowing it all together with the fact that the Koran is the word of God itself !?In what a kind of way then ' God ' came into the universe and spread the word !? This question has no answer, it has no meaning !
Why should ' something' lower its eternal shields to share possible knowledge about itself with being like us, beings ' he' created some 5 billion years after he opened up for the first time the universe !? To dive into such matter is to hit hard bottom for sure ! To which it will thereafter forever stick to ask the next question :- " if that what is in accordance with its nature for eternity; comes to exist and only can be talked about in this manner in what we call time; gets born; grows and dies_ how can we call this Eternal God !?" In short, if God was willing to straighten things out, and he made this very clear within the paradox of his son, Christ, why settle for the insults and humilations his divine person unworthy !?
Or is the purpose of our existence just Gods way of letting known he is out there !? He's so vain !!!!!