logo Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
2023-12-05 09:25:40 CoV Wiki
Learn more about the Church of Virus
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Everyone into the pool! Now online... the VirusWiki.

  Church of Virus BBS
  Philosophy & Religion

  The number of the beast
previous next
Pages: [1] Reply Notify of replies Send the topic Print 
   Author  Topic: The number of the beast  (Read 1070 times)

Gender: Male
Posts: 1318
Reputation: 7.99
Rate rhinoceros

My point is ...

View Profile WWW E-Mail
The number of the beast
« on: 2004-04-20 11:08:58 »
Reply with quote

Normally, I tend to think that religion is a result of the material conditions of man and the group rather than a cause (as far as one can ignore the feedback loops). This article argues for the contrary:

Their beliefs are bonkers, but
they are at the heart of power

US Christian fundamentalists are driving Bush's Middle East policy

George Monbiot
Tuesday April 20, 2004
The Guardian

To understand what is happening in the Middle East, you must first understand what is happening in Texas. To understand what is happening there, you should read the resolutions passed at the state's Republican party conventions last month. Take a look, for example, at the decisions made in Harris County, which covers much of Houston.

The delegates began by nodding through a few uncontroversial matters: homosexuality is contrary to the truths ordained by God; "any mechanism to process, license, record, register or monitor the ownership of guns" should be repealed; income tax, inheritance tax, capital gains tax and corporation tax should be abolished; and immigrants should be deterred by electric fences. Thus fortified, they turned to the real issue: the affairs of a small state 7,000 miles away. It was then, according to a participant, that the "screaming and near fist fights" began.

I don't know what the original motion said, but apparently it was "watered down significantly" as a result of the shouting match. The motion they adopted stated that Israel has an undivided claim to Jerusalem and the West Bank, that Arab states should be "pressured" to absorb refugees from Palestine, and that Israel should do whatever it wishes in seeking to eliminate terrorism. Good to see that the extremists didn't prevail then.

But why should all this be of such pressing interest to the people of a state which is seldom celebrated for its fascination with foreign affairs? The explanation is slowly becoming familiar to us, but we still have some difficulty in taking it seriously.

In the United States, several million people have succumbed to an extraordinary delusion. In the 19th century, two immigrant preachers cobbled together a series of unrelated passages from the Bible to create what appears to be a consistent narrative: Jesus will return to Earth when certain preconditions have been met. The first of these was the establishment of a state of Israel. The next involves Israel's occupation of the rest of its "biblical lands" (most of the Middle East), and the rebuilding of the Third Temple on the site now occupied by the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa mosques. The legions of the antichrist will then be deployed against Israel, and their war will lead to a final showdown in the valley of Armageddon. The Jews will either burn or convert to Christianity, and the Messiah will return to Earth.

What makes the story so appealing to Christian fundamentalists is that before the big battle begins, all "true believers" (ie those who believe what they believe) will be lifted out of their clothes and wafted up to heaven during an event called the Rapture. Not only do the worthy get to sit at the right hand of God, but they will be able to watch, from the best seats, their political and religious opponents being devoured by boils, sores, locusts and frogs, during the seven years of Tribulation which follow.

The true believers are now seeking to bring all this about. This means staging confrontations at the old temple site (in 2000, three US Christians were deported for trying to blow up the mosques there), sponsoring Jewish settlements in the occupied territories, demanding ever more US support for Israel, and seeking to provoke a final battle with the Muslim world/Axis of Evil/United Nations/ European Union/France or whoever the legions of the antichrist turn out to be.

The believers are convinced that they will soon be rewarded for their efforts. The antichrist is apparently walking among us, in the guise of Kofi Annan, Javier Solana, Yasser Arafat or, more plausibly, Silvio Berlusconi. The Wal-Mart corporation is also a candidate (in my view a very good one), because it wants to radio-tag its stock, thereby exposing humankind to the Mark of the Beast.

By clicking on www.raptureready.com, you can discover how close you might be to flying out of your pyjamas. The infidels among us should take note that the Rapture Index currently stands at 144, just one point below the critical threshold, beyond which the sky will be filled with floating nudists. Beast Government, Wild Weather and Israel are all trading at the maximum five points (the EU is debat ing its constitution, there was a freak hurricane in the south Atlantic, Hamas has sworn to avenge the killing of its leaders), but the second coming is currently being delayed by an unfortunate decline in drug abuse among teenagers and a weak showing by the antichrist (both of which score only two).

We can laugh at these people, but we should not dismiss them. That their beliefs are bonkers does not mean they are marginal. American pollsters believe that 15-18% of US voters belong to churches or movements which subscribe to these teachings. A survey in 1999 suggested that this figure included 33% of Republicans. The best-selling contemporary books in the US are the 12 volumes of the Left Behind series, which provide what is usually described as a "fictionalised" account of the Rapture (this, apparently, distinguishes it from the other one), with plenty of dripping details about what will happen to the rest of us. The people who believe all this don't believe it just a little; for them it is a matter of life eternal and death.

And among them are some of the most powerful men in America. John Ashcroft, the attorney general, is a true believer, so are several prominent senators and the House majority leader, Tom DeLay. Mr DeLay (who is also the co-author of the marvellously named DeLay-Doolittle Amendment, postponing campaign finance reforms) travelled to Israel last year to tell the Knesset that "there is no middle ground, no moderate position worth taking".

So here we have a major political constituency - representing much of the current president's core vote - in the most powerful nation on Earth, which is actively seeking to provoke a new world war. Its members see the invasion of Iraq as a warm-up act, as Revelation (9:14-15) maintains that four angels "which are bound in the great river Euphrates" will be released "to slay the third part of men". They batter down the doors of the White House as soon as its support for Israel wavers: when Bush asked Ariel Sharon to pull his tanks out of Jenin in 2002, he received 100,000 angry emails from Christian fundamentalists, and never mentioned the matter again.

The electoral calculation, crazy as it appears, works like this. Governments stand or fall on domestic issues. For 85% of the US electorate, the Middle East is a foreign issue, and therefore of secondary interest when they enter the polling booth. For 15% of the electorate, the Middle East is not just a domestic matter, it's a personal one: if the president fails to start a conflagration there, his core voters don't get to sit at the right hand of God. Bush, in other words, stands to lose fewer votes by encouraging Israeli aggression than he stands to lose by restraining it. He would be mad to listen to these people. He would also be mad not to.

Report to moderator   Logged
Joe Dees

Posts: 5428
Reputation: 1.21
Rate Joe Dees

I love YaBB SE!

View Profile WWW
Re:The number of the beast
« Reply #1 on: 2004-04-20 11:12:40 »
Reply with quote

[[ author reputation (1.21) beneath threshold (3)... display message ]]

Report to moderator   Logged

Posts: 49
Reputation: 5.05
Rate Durazac15

Take me with water and a grain of salt

View Profile
Re:The number of the beast
« Reply #2 on: 2004-04-20 18:51:40 »
Reply with quote

Contrary to the article, and ancedotaly, I spend most my time with fundamentalists and they almost to a man oppose bringing democracy to the Middle East. They don't think the people are "moral" enough for the wisdom they have to offer. In my experience most fundamentalists (and that is NOT a bad word) are generally isolationists. They want to keep the immorality of Europe and it's secular governments at bay. They worry about the erosion of Christian values, the erosion of English, and maintaining their culture without foreign influence. The first several motions they passed demonstrates this.

The whole idea of "rapture" is there, but only as a metaphor. They are not willing to actually do anything. Sure you have your screamers, and perhaps 15% of the Republican party swings that way, but remember that this is 15% of about 40 % of the people. So not really very many. And to point out Ashcroft and DeLay is even more insignificant. Unlike smaller countries without democratic representation, far too many people have a voice to permit such a tiny minority any real power. As it is, Ashcroft barely gets anything he wants, and even though he does get a little, no person in his right mind trusts the man. DeLay is in the same boat, he's simply not taken seriously, AND he is a representative, not a Senator, which means he is essentially without power. These people are not going to bring on armageddon to anyone, though I'm sure it is fun news.

Just an observation.

« Last Edit: 2004-04-20 19:01:28 by Durazac15 » Report to moderator   Logged

Smiling through it all

Durazac 15
David Lucifer

Posts: 2641
Reputation: 8.91
Rate David Lucifer

Enlighten me.

View Profile WWW E-Mail
Re:The number of the beast
« Reply #3 on: 2004-05-03 10:03:42 »
Reply with quote

Quote from: Durazac15 on 2004-04-20 18:51:40   

Contrary to the article, and ancedotaly, I spend most my time with fundamentalists and they almost to a man oppose bringing democracy to the Middle East. They don't think the people are "moral" enough for the wisdom they have to offer. In my experience most fundamentalists (and that is NOT a bad word) are generally isolationists.

Just out of curiosity, why do you feel it necessary to say that fundamentalist is NOT a bad word?
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1] Reply Notify of replies Send the topic Print 
Jump to:

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Church of Virus BBS | Powered by YaBB SE
© 2001-2002, YaBB SE Dev Team. All Rights Reserved.

Please support the CoV.
Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS! RSS feed