From: David Hill (dhill@spee-dee.com)
Date: Thu Jan 24 2002 - 16:05:03 MST
I don't see why "Divine intervention would violate the 2nd law..." as an
omnipotent individual could violate, rescind, abrogate or ignore the law he,
she or it ostensibly set up in the first place.
I prefer "Creation by Committee" because no individual could have possibly
screwed it up this badly alone. Reality is a C- term project in any self
respecting God University.
And the claim that "every attempt to explain that model is easily
disprovable," simply shows that the criteria you accept for proof is not
sufficiently demanding.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
Of Bill Roh
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:29 PM
To: virus@lucifer.com
Subject: Re: virus: Kirk: Standing my ground
<SNIP>
2> David: "The mounting and single value of the evidence is immaterial
because
it takes only one divine intervention to change the result. Could happen at
any
time." Bill: Divine intervention would violate the 2nd law of
thermodynamics -
which means God would have to exist only in our Universe to operate - and if
that is the case, tell me which part of our Universe houses heaven and hell.
The
Christian model of god is certainly man made as every attempt to expain that
model is easily disprovable, and in most cases attributable to a particlar
person.
<SNIP>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
> Of Steele, Kirk A
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 6:40 PM
> To: 'virus@lucifer.com'
> Subject: RE: virus: Kirk: Standing my ground
>
> no. search for Pascal' wager to understand agnosticism
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:41 MDT