RE: virus: 1 point, some advice and a challenge or two to Yash.

From: Yash (yashk2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Jan 12 2002 - 08:12:28 MST


Insa Rennes, Brittany, Class of 97. Check it out by contacting the
personnel. They've also got a website which you can find easily.

BTW, who's the dimwit who asserted "This guy doesn't know Shite from
Shinola - Base 50!" when you had obivously given just a quick perusal of the
exercise?

There's nothing I need to give up as I never asserted anything. I just
mentioned an example. All other sssertions were made by Hermit and yourself.
I don't need to challenge or support these things.

You, on the other hand, just jumped on the bandwagon. But your few last
posts just exposed how worked up you get about all this without even giving
things a proper look.

How about admitting finally that there wasn't anything about Base 50 in that
post for that matter, and also admitting you didn't read the text or tried
to udnerstand it completely but just labelled it as crap as soon as you say
"base 50", assuming it was mathematics in base 50?

You're still not doing that. Instead of admitting how wrong you were, you
just started along the line "Oh, EVERYBODY Loves YASH," etc.. obviously
side-stepping what the point really was.

Yash.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
Of Steele, Kirk A

Hey Yash, Herm doesnt MERELY CLAIM personal domain over a minima knowledge
base as an experienced, peer accepted EXPERT. He is one.

You CLAIM such expertise for yourself by telling us that you are a SYSTEMS
ENGINEER. You have yet to demonstrate this.

You wrap all your assertions around yourself vis a vis, your arguments are
demonstrably extensions of your ego.

We first tried reason, we second tried logic, we resorted to rattling you
through ad hominum as a last resort. NOTHING TOOK. You still assert this
nonsense, which has been clearly measured and weighed and found lacking. You
need to learn to step outside yourself.

Whether or not you NOW assert that you are only talking about a phonemic
encoding schema, your original assertions, on which this whole diatribe you
insist on promulgating is based, have been soundly thrashed, reasonably.
Give them up.

The fact that you won't, says volumes. The fact that you slither from one
perspective from within the scope the argument to another, says more still.

Kirkasaurus Wrecks

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:39 MDT