What should be the minimum reputation required to post to the Virus mailing list?
anyone can post - 0	3.19	(2.68%)
any and all Meridion members can post - 1	1.79	(1.50%)
all but the globally despised - 2	3.26	(2.74%)
all but the outcasts - 3	0.19	(0.16%)
all but the disreputable - 4	60.62	(50.81%)
members in good standing - 5	47.76	(40.03%)
well known members - 6	0.00	(0.00%)
only highly respected members - 7	2.20	(1.85%)
super l33t virions - 8	0.00	(0.00%)
no one should be allowed - 9	0.29	(0.24%)
decisiveness		(12.86%)
unvoted equity		(20.48%)
voted equity		(79.52%)
33 Voters: David Lucifer, Cassidy McGurk, Sat, rhinoceros, Durazac15, opsima, Walter Watts, Matt Arnold, Drakeo Vortex, goomba, Mermaid, Casey, ElvenSage, Kharin, michelle, Tywick, Kid-A, the.bricoleur, outlawpoet, Ophis, DrSebby, prometheus, Flux, MoEnzyme, LenKen, ZenWarrior, DJ dAndroid, chippedlogic, Pabreetzio, simul, pickler, Hermit, teh,
voter	voted for	comment
Cassidy McGurk	private	no comment
Sat	private	no comment
Durazac15	private	When you stop listening to the outcasts, you stop listening to the Darwins...
David Lucifer	all but the disreputable - 4 members in good standing - 5	Keep in mind it is difficult to get a rating lower than 4.
Matt Arnold	members in good standing - 5	no comment
Walter Watts	all but the disreputable - 4	Stop the madness--But I want it on record I think we should have a "Disreputable Forum" to archive the occasional outburst of genius from these marginals
opsima	all but the outcasts - 3 all but the disreputable - 4	no comment
Mermaid	all but the disreputable - 4	no comment
Drakeo Vortex	all but the disreputable - 4	no comment
Casey	all but the disreputable - 4	I like Walter's idea - there should be a forum for disreputable posters because they do, at times, offer beautiful gems to this community.
ElvenSage	anyone can post - 0	I do not wish to make it so anyone cannot post. We shouldn't censor others... yet I have no other good answer for the current problem.
rhinoceros	all but the disreputable - 4	Anyone should *want* to post without being embarrassed to be seen here.
Kharin	private	no comment
michelle	anyone can post - 0	Why would anyone want to limit the flow of ideas? To ignore requires minimal self-discipline. Speaking of discipline, there are other actions to keep undesirables from posting if they've abused it. Right?
goomba	anyone can post - 0 all but the disreputable - 4 no one should be allowed - 9	i dont read the list, so my vote probably shouldnt count much
Tywick	anyone can post - 0	no comment
Kid-A	any and all Meridion members can post - 1	no comment
the.bricoleur	private	no comment
outlawpoet	all but the globally despised - 2	no comment
Ophis	anyone can post - 0	Anyone should be able to post but what we need is a method for individual members to be able to filter posts based on user name, reputation, etc.
DrSebby	private	no comment
prometheus	private	no comment
Flux	private	no comment
MoEnzyme	all but the disreputable - 4	I agree with Walter's idea on this.
LenKen	all but the disreputable - 4	I vehemently disagree with what Walter Watts said, but he’s right.  ;)
ZenWarrior	all but the outcasts - 3	no comment
DJ dAndroid	all but the outcasts - 3	no comment
chippedlogic	private	no comment
Pabreetzio	private	no comment
simul	all but the outcasts - 3	no comment
pickler	any and all Meridion members can post - 1	even the disreputable people occasionaly make good points (having a "mute" option per user is a good idea)
Hermit	all but the globally despised - 2 only highly respected members - 7	In an ideal world each member would create their own forum. In "their" forum they can select either on a poster or a per post basis. Posts and posters carried by many subforums would automagically appear on the main site. Until then "Walter's solution".
teh	all but the outcasts - 3	no comment