Blunderov
Archon     
Gender: 
Posts: 3160 Reputation: 8.23 Rate Blunderov

"We think in generalities, we live in details"
|
 |
virus: RE: virus : Enthymeme
« on: 2004-06-11 15:12:56 » |
|
[Blunderov] I have never heard of this before. Interesting word. Best Regards.
http://atheism.about.com/library/glossary/general/bldef_enthymeme.htm <q> Definition: An enthymeme is a deductive argument which is expressed in ordinary language, rather than formal logical language, and from which some key premise has been omitted (usually because, in ordinary conversation, it does not need to be expressed). For example:
Socrates is a man, therefore Socrates is mortal.
This argument leaves out the premise "All men are mortal," which is found when this argument is expressed more formally:
All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
Normally, there is nothing wrong with an enthymeme - but using them can give the appearance of creating a non sequitur, so one should be careful. Using them can also mask an important premise, as with the following quote taken from a press release from the Ayn Rand Institute:
skin color... should not be a factor in evaluating... competence or moral stature. It follows that skin color should not be a factor in taking actions toward other people, e.g., hiring and admitting to universities.
The above argument is an enthymeme, because it leaves out the critical premise "Hiring and university admission should be based solely on competence or moral stature." Without that premise, the above argument would simply be a non sequitur. Enthymemes should not, therefore, be employed when the missing premise is at all questionable or debatable. </q>
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
|