From: Bill Roh (billroh@churchofvirus.com)
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 11:15:56 MST
It's not really the ass you are smelling - though I am sure you know that. And of
course, you have to develop your sense of smell so than you can tell if she is or is
not ovulating. Maybe thats possible - I don't know. Now I don't know about you, but I
usually head for a womans nether regions somewhat before intercourse - it's a big part
of foreplay afterall. So, when you go down on her, if you get that "she's ovulating"
smell - then yea, keep your army out of her barracks!
Bill
PS. If you are a super human, like myself - just order your sperm not to impregnate
her. I admit that I was quite a "caution to the wind" sexaholic most my life - never
had a pregnancy. I was beginning to question my ability - then the wife and I said
"lets have a baby" and she was pregnant 3 months later. Go figure - 10 years of
unprotected sex with the same woman and her period was never even late. Then we decide
to get pregnant and POW - My son Quinn is conceived.
Bodie wrote:
> So all I have to do to have a good 1 night stand without any risks is to
> smell the girls arse. Great, just about that time she's running at 100mph
> in the opposite direction, I think I'll give that one a miss
>
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Bill Roh wrote:
>
> > I'll mention some more of the specifics I remember just to clear some things up:
> >
> > Yes, I thought I made it clear that it was the lack of sense of smell in the
> > first sentence.
> >
> > 1> It is also the fact that to get a really good wiff - your head would need to
> > be located at ass height. Obviously aside from the poor smell, the nose is
> > poorly loacted, in most cases, for a really good wiff.
> > 2> At the time when people were developing into people, we seldom lived that
> > long (40 years) - we were lucky to make it to puberty. If you lived to 30 you
> > were an old man. So instead of 27 or 28 years of reproductive potential, it was
> > only a few years, maybe 10 that you were able to reproduce.
> > 3> Even if 20 out of 100 got pregnant - at the time we were developing that
> > would have been a catastrophic % of reproducing women. I would think anyway.
> > Infant mortality at the time had to be phenominal.
> > 4>I am not positing this as the answer, but a possible one of many aspects that
> > drove the bus to monogamy.
> >
> > regards
> > Bill
> >
> >
> > L' Ermit wrote:
> >
> > > [Bill] Something that you seemed to miss here that I picked up from the book
> > > "Demonic Males - Apes and the Origins of Human Violance" by Richard Wrangham
> > > and Dale Peterson:
> > >
> > > [Bill] All of the apes except humans have a sense of smell capable of
> > > telling the males when the females are fertile. This means that the ape can
> > > pay little or no attention to the female except when necessary - when sex is
> > > likely to result in a pregnancy. Humans on the other hand cannot tell by
> > > smell alone when the proper time to mate is. Women have learned over the
> > > millenea to hide their cycle from the males.
> > >
> > > [Hermit] No. The woman still releases pheromenes - at about the same level
> > > as chimpanzees. It is the man (and the woman) who have traded the sense of
> > > smell for the ability to think.
> > >
> > > [Bill] This means that in order to create a baby, to reproduce, the male
> > > must entice the female to ramain with him throughout a the reproductive
> > > years if they wish to reproduce.
> > >
> > > [Hermit] If 100 averagely fertile women mate randomly with averagely fertile
> > > men over a one year period at average rates [3x per week below age 40], but
> > > without using contraceptives, then about 20/100 women will become pregnant.
> > >
> > > [Hermit] If, in the course of a serious overnight relationship, you fuck
> > > under the same circumstances (as too many US kids do), it seems that the
> > > probability is a lot higher (as is the probability of catching something
> > > else simultaneously - which also might explain the 25% STD rate in the under
> > > 25).
> > >
> > > [Bill] So - it is in part a woman's deception that puts the males in a
> > > position of choosing to remain with them - or risk their reproductive
> > > future.
> > >
> > > [Hermit] Given the above, I have to say it is an elegant theory, but it does
> > > not match all the known facts.
> > >
> > > [Bill] Certainly there are other arguments - but I thought this one might
> > > help
> > >
> > > Kind Regards
> > >
> > > Hermit
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:39 MDT