From: Yash (yashk2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Jan 04 2002 - 12:53:26 MST
Forget it Hermit, I told you you wouldn't be able to understand, especially
if you don't grasp what Blake meant when he wrote "To See a World in a Grain
of Sand", or when the ancients wrote "As Above, So Below".
The only way you can get close to perceiving these kinds of things is to be
a systems thinker because you have obviously not been initiated into
thinking symbolically.
There is One Reality, Herm, and many aspects of its manifestation.
Ultimately all thoughts go to the original one (at least for those with eyes
to see).
So you think you're a scientist. I'll tell you you're half a real scientist.
Discoveries of the sort that Newton and Kepler made will always be out of
your reach. You are not a discoverer, you just rehash blindly.
Plus you're not saying anything constructive about the idea of building a
language for easy knowledge storage and compression and transmission. All
you're doing is trying hard (but your arguments are badly done) to try to
discredit some of the influential sources. Puny rhetoric as I said.
You may be right after all: if you can't understand it even after it's been
explained to you in more detail than you could ever hope for, then maybe you
should drop the subject.
Yash.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
Of L' Ermit
I wrote a long letter about this, and Hotmail chomped it when I tried to
send it. So have a relatively short one in its place - it looks long only
because I have appended the programs I wrote in an attempt to prove by
example why this is nonsense. Hopefully these results will make it
self-evident to the statistically and logically impaired, who appear to
believe that the Vedas "really truly" contain some "hidden" data which has
been extracted from it by careful analysis, that they are accepting a sucker
proposition - unless they really truly <em>believe</em> that Herman Melville
really intended to "hide" the value of PI in the text of Moby Dick - and
being superior to Bronze Age priests, did so to 38 places... in not one but
two places. Which latter would, I regret, be more than sufficient evidence
to convince me that they are severely IQ deficient or suffering from
classical theological intellectual dishonesty.
Below is the distribution of PI to various precisions as found in Moby Dick
using similar rules (see the below programs) as claimed for the "Hindu
Codes."
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:38 MDT