Differences between version 6 and previous revision of agnosticism.

Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author

Newer page: version 6 Last edited on Monday, July 28, 2003 6:02:46 pm. by VectorHermit
Older page: version 3 Last edited on Friday, December 13, 2002 2:45:19 pm. by DavidLucifer
@@ -3 +3,11 @@
 The epistemological stance that knowledge is only as certain as the available evidence. It is [skepticism], especially as pertaining to questions of [religion]. Agnosticism is consistent with [atheism]. 
+ 
+A - without  
+Gnosis - intuitive knowledge of spiritual truths (as claimed by the gnostics).  
+ 
+Here is the unarguable "horse's mouth" (Huxley coined the word)  
+Quote:  
+...it is wrong for a man to say that he is certain of the objective truth of any proposition unless he can produce evidence which logically justifies that certainty. This is what Agnosticism asserts; and, in my opinion, it is all that is essential to Agnosticism. That which Agnostics deny, and repudiate as immoral, is the contrary doctrine, that there are propositions which men ought to [believe|belief], without logically satisfactory evidence."  
+("Agnosticism and Christianity and Other Essays", Thomas Henry Huxley 1889, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, 1992, p. 193.)  
+ 
+So an agnostic, asserts that the nature or attributes of the gods is unknowable except through the intuition. This of course, has as the corollary, as Huxley (as a Deist) most certainly meant, the proposition that [gods|OnGod] exist in some shape, form and quantity, albeit "necessarily" objectively unknown** (and sometimes meant as an assertion that these attributes are unknowable) to the agnostic (and sometimes meaning to everyone).