Differences between version 8 and predecessor to the previous major change of VirianProjects.

Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author

Newer page: version 8 Last edited on Thursday, October 9, 2003 8:06:37 pm. by VectorFlux
Older page: version 1 Last edited on Thursday, October 9, 2003 5:10:58 pm. by VectorHermit
@@ -43,7 +43,9 @@
 A project can expect assistance or resources from fellow [Virians|Virian] to the extent it convinces them that it is a worthwhile cause. Important and successfull projects will be praised by the community, which will add to their scope (the Meridion reputation and voting system could be used for this purpose). Unsuccessful projects will be forgotten. Objectionable projects will be either banned or labeled heretic and left to their own. Some projects may have a special global status in the community (maybe the Ideohazard ezine qualifies for one)<We already have an IdeoHazard tree root, but this may be a good idea for further development>, with their rules set by the community. 
  
 <I have not established a rule on announcements, but this might be rephrased to take the Wiki rules-set established at the top of the page into account> 
 Any virian who is allowed access to the Wiki (reputation 6+) can start a project by creating a Wiki page of the form !VirianProjectXxxxxx, set the goals and some ground rules, announce it in the online facilities of CoV (BBS, mailing list, IRC), promote it, and seek members. The actual work will be done in the other facilities of CoV, but a clear account of the project, its achievements, its status, the rules, and all the links to the facilities it uses should be present somewhere (its Wiki page is a good place for that). Maybe we can also have a Projects section on the BBS later. 
+ 
+Shouldn't [ChurchOfVirus/Tasks] be upgraded and included to this new structure?  
  
 More to follow. Add your thought here. 
 ----