> From: jonesr@gatwick.geco-prakla.slb.com
> > > From: jonesr@gatwick.Geco-Prakla.slb.com
> >
> > > Mind you, unless you smoke pot pure, then you're still taking in the
> > > cigarette smoke.
> >
> > Pot smoke is not cigarette smoke. They both have different chemical
> > compositions.
> >
>
> Yep, but the point I was making (and not a *very* important point at that)
> is that unless you don't roll your J's with any tobacco in them at all,
> then you're still smoking cigarettes, essentially, just with extra bits
> in it. So smoking unpure pot *is* carcinogenic :)
Tobacco leaves give off different chemicals than pot leaves or, for that
matter, wood does. Therefore it would *have* to have a different effect:
Either more carcniogenic or less carinogenic. The evidence seems to
be that pot smoking is less (but it still is carcinogenic).
What is unpure pot?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu May 23 2002 - 04:00:34 MDT