On Tue, 17 Dec 1996, Dave Pape wrote:
[CLIP]
> >2) There's a big oversight when you have two high-power theories [explain
> >much, extensively verified] that are immiscible [like oil and water].
> >The problem is, *where* the oversight is, is unknown.
>
> That's very very interesting. This is presumably thing like the EPR paradox
> etc... here's one for XYZ... Einstein's mates and Bohm's posse, the two
> gangs that have explained the most phenomena ever, each with townsful of
> evidence, fighting it out, locked in debate. That'll be memes competing for
> brainspace, then.
The EPR paradox, superficially, is a linguistic problem. I'm thinking of
garbage like nonconservation of mass-energy, or the sudden lack of
existence of a particle in the nonrelativistic domain.
[CLIP]
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/ Towards the conversion of data into information....
/
/ Kenneth Boyd
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu May 23 2002 - 04:00:34 MDT