"zaimoni@ksu.edu" at Dec 16, 96 11:46:18 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-virus@lucifer.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
> Yes, the state-space of all reachable algorithms is the "preexisting" bit.
By that reasoning, /no/ process of discovery in the intellectual field
is anything more than a "hunt," as the state-space of all possible
memes/physical-states is being "searched."
> I agree that "breeding" an algorithm isn't linearly rational, but it may
> very well be parallelly/nonlinearly rational. I'm experimenting with that
> [by hand] in some of my side studies.
Oh, I'm not so sure about it being nonlinearly rational; it starts
with a single idea (an idea of what's `better') and grows a tree,
checking the leaves for `goodness.' Pretty linear /seen on that
level/, but looking at it from a progress PoV, its non-congruant.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu May 23 2002 - 04:00:34 MDT