Well, no I didn't. There was no mistake or spontaneity involved in my
reply at all. I use the word from the following definition- '6. The
central or integral part; the vital core.' I admit to teasing (you and
others) with it. At the moment, it is also the only definition adhering
to the word I can come to a grip with....
My skepticism requires contact. If that is objectivism, so be it. I
think, however, that my definition of contact is more far-ranging than
the usual objectivist's. But I don't travel in their circles, either.
*****************
Wade T. Smith
morbius@channel1.com | "There ain't nothin' you
wade_smith@harvard.edu | shouldn't do to a god."
morbius@cyberwarped.com |
******* http://www.channel1.com/users/morbius/ *******