> At 09:30 AM 10/16/97 CST+6CDT, chardin wrote:
>
> >While Heisenberg did say that the particles "pop" into existence in a
>
> >way that can't be predicted, isn't it possible that there is a
> >pattern, it is just that we don't have enough information to
> >understand where the next "pop" is going to be?
>
> This is called the "hidden variables" interpretation of QM. I read
> in one of the articles in the latest issue of Skeptic that most
> researchers working in the field are not holding much hope for
> it these days (for whatever that's worth).
>
> --
> David McFadzean david@lucifer.com
> Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/
> Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/
What does this mean, that they don't think it happensat all, or they
don't think they will be able to explain why it does happen? Thanks
Sodom