Re: virus:Logic

Nathaniel Hall (natehall@worldnet.att.net)
Wed, 08 Oct 1997 16:17:49 -0600


chardin wrote:

> > Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 23:58:40 -0600
> > From: Nathaniel Hall <natehall@worldnet.att.net>
> > To: virus@lucifer.com
> > Subject: Re: virus:Logic
> > Reply-to: virus@lucifer.com
>
> >
> >
> > Marie Foster wrote:
> >
> > > I am going to risk it and sling in my thoughts about science -
> > > religion. It seems to me that both are attempts to explain the
> > > existence of the energy we seem to agree exists. How well or poorly
> > > either does this has to do more with the power structure that uses ( or
> > > misuses) the insights gained.
> >
> > Insights gained? One gets insight when one uses ones eyes to see (science)
> > not when one shuts them (religion). Power structure? Who controls your
> > thoughts when you choose to think freely? Who controls your thoughts when
> > your a cult member?The Nateman, waiting for the inquisition.
> >
> >
> >
> Nateman, does the term " Pascal's Wager" mean anything to you?

> If
> you are right, I have no worries. From the primordial slime we came
> and to the dust of the grave I shall return. If we are
> right....you could be in biggg trouble!
> Never mind that the Pope said there was a special place in hell for
> Pascal. :)

I could not have faith even if I wanted to. It's simply not in my nature. If you
think I'm in big trouble check out this guy:
http://members.iquest.net/~teevie/sagan.htmlThe Nateman