virus: SM

Reed Konsler (konsler@ascat.harvard.edu)
Fri, 26 Sep 1997 10:24:14 -0400 (EDT)


>Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 16:11:21 -0700
>From: Tadeusz Niwinski <tad@teta.ai>

>Can we make a list of primary concepts (ie. not derivable from other
>concepts) first?

Sure, let's try.

>I move that REALITY is a primary concept. Once we agree that it is, we may
>start looking at it's properties. If we do not agree, then we can look for
>a definition of Reality based on other primary concepts.

I do not accept <reality> as primary. In fact, it seems to be to be a very
distant
derivative which we will only arrive at after many, many years of searching.
I move we start with <perception> which is something we are all doing
right now.

>I don't think we can get anywhere without an agreement on primary concepts
>we use.

Are you trying to get somewhere? Tad, you need to log off the computer and
WALK...oh, sorry...that was a metaphor, huh? Getting somewhere...

I don't think I understand exactly what you mean? Where are we going?

Reed

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reed Konsler konsler@ascat.harvard.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------