> That is hard to believe, since I tried to explain what
> I meant by "objectively real" and there is no consensus
> on what everyone else means by "real". How could they
> be the same?
Hmmm,... you talked about what was "objectively real" and each person had
a different view of what "real" meant, therefore how could your
"objectively real" be the consensus "real"?
Interesting. (Especially after you remove the quotation marks!)
-Prof. Tim