RE: virus: Sham(an) again

David McFadzean (david@lucifer.com)
Sun, 21 Sep 1997 13:47:53 -0600

At 10:06 AM 9/17/97 +0100, Robin Faichney wrote:
>http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/TRIALERR.html
>
>This is one of the fundamental principles of evolution. There is no
>theoretical aspect to it, whatsoever, which is why it's not science.
>This is not a case of which comes first, experiment or hypothesis,
>because there is no hypothesis, and therefore, unless you use
>the word very loosely, no experiment either.

It took me awhile but I think I found a problem in your position.
If human action is not completely random (and I think it obviously
is not) then there is an implicit theory behind their choices.

--
David McFadzean                 david@lucifer.com
Memetic Engineer                http://www.lucifer.com/~david/
Church of Virus                 http://www.lucifer.com/virus/