Humility is a *choice* for a superior person, not an necessity (as opposed
to humility being a necessity for the person who does not have the correct
answer to a "math problem", for example 1+1). Allowing for an incorrect
answer to the problem is one of grace...the time for grace will run out for
people who cling to inferior answers.
Brett
At 08:58 AM 8/13/97 -0400, you wrote:
>
>> " I think he's making the point that superiority is relative and
>> situational, not absolute." (Eva)
>
>> Superiority is absolute! the only people who prefer the "relative"
>nature
>> of insuperiority are non-superior people...and who cares what THEY
>prefer.
>
>Brett
>
>The only people who believe superiority is absolute are inferior people who
>are unable to understand the relative nature of superiority. What could an
>inferior man teach a superior man? In the case above: humility by
>counter-example.
>
Returning,
rBERTS%n
Rabble Sonnet Retort
Take what you can use and let the rest go by.
KEN KESEY