> Wade T.Smith wrote:
> >
> >Well, I do hold the axiom that the truth is demonstrable, in whatever
> >form. And that the supernatural is not. With the result that I do not
> >hold the supernatural to be truth.
>
> Did you ever consider that some of what is presented
> as "supernatural" might be metaphor, or other non-
> literal forms of communication?
>
> Robin (who in his first semester of religious studies learned that
> *all* talk of "God" is analogical)
"Man--this is the mystery of religion--projects his being into
objectivity, and then again makes himself an object to this projected
image of himself thus converted into a subject; he thinks of himself, is
an object to himself, but as the object of an object, of another being
than himself."
--Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach, _The Essence of Christianity_, pp. 29-30
Eva