I have had the occasion to read some of the archives,
and am pleased to see that worthwhile discussions are
going on at Virus. I would like to point out that none
of the definition-arguements have ever lead to greater
understanding, a possible reason to cease them.
There is one thing that I have grown interested in, and
that is the idea of Original Thoughts. What is the
consensous at Virus? Do we have Original Thoughts, or
is it just rearranging things that we have heard before?
Consider the implications before stating your opinion.
Has anyone done concrete research on this?
ps I may be getting a steady connection soon, so . . .
be afraid. be very afraid.
Corey A. Cook
cookcore@esuvm.emporia.edu
****************************
* The One Universal Truth: *
* Sometimes, you're wrong. *
****************************