When did I say that? Are we talking about good and evil or the values of
martydom? Whichever you want to talk about is fine with me, but I need to know.
> A thing has value only if valued because objects do have
>have essences and thus are incapable of "being" good or bad or
>_valuable_.
Living things have essences, non-living things channel essence, they have
none of their own.
> It is only /us/ (the minds) that bring value to objects.
>Before I go any farther, is this what you beleive, or have I
>misinterpreted?
I was only saying that there is a fine distinction between dying in a
cause and dying for a cause. The the only difference /is/ how much of
yourself you have commited to the cause, how much of your soul, and that you
have to value what you commit else it isn't truly commited at only, only
borrowed.
>
>(I need more time to think anyway)
>
All the time you need is your for the taking.
Strange Love,
Darkstar