Re: virus: Angelica de Meme

Tony Hindle (t.hindle@joney.demon.co.uk)
Sun, 4 May 1997 23:23:38 +0100


In message <199704212244.XAA10768@typhoon.dial.pipex.net>, Dave Pape=20
<davepape@dial.pipex.com> writes
>Robin Faichney wrote:
>
>>(Self-consciousness/awareness is
>>not literally consc of consc or aware of aware else we'd
>>have infinite loops.)
>
>Hmmm... I've been having a kind of think about this kind of issue lately...

Hmm... I've been thinking a kind of thought
about this kind of issue lately...
>
>[PUTS ON CHEMICAL BROTHERS' NEW ALBUM, "DIG YOUR OWN HOLE", VIRGIN RECORDS
>=A313.49]
>
[PUTS ON BILL HICKS' NEW ALBUM, "RANT IN E-MINOR" , 1997, RYKODISC.

>What if the recursion didn't go /upwards/, but /forwards in time/?

[TAKES BILL OFF COS HE IS TOO FUNNY TO HAVE IN BACKGROUND BUT =
=20
T WAS GOOD FOR ONE MORE HOFSTADTERIAN LINE] =20
>
>(Freeforming like a mutha)
(Freeforming like a father ;-)
=20
>
>Is consciousness a kind of autopoietic thing? Like my body, maintained as
>its cells reproduce, and thus continuing its existence? So, it CAN be
>self-referential, but the build-up of levels kind of falls forward into the
>/time/ dimension? And if so, is part of the deal that you always FORGET
>early iterations of the loops? IE, you cease to be aware of the ideas on
>which your current ideas are based, and the cells which gave rise to your
>current cells die...?
=20
In this model what is sleep. Is it when. Is sleep when biuld-up=20
of levels never gets to representing itself? (I am with Dennet on the=20
boilogical role of sleep, asking what biological role of being awake is=20
is more revealing (ans. eat + get laid...ever wonder why there is no=20
more desire for consciousness after a good meal/shag esp. BOTH)).
>
>[ALL THIS ASSUMES SELF-REPLICATION AND SELF-REFERENCE ARE BOUND TOGETHER
>FAIRLY CLOSELY]

Could self reference be a kind of self-replication in time but=20
not space type thing? I am loosely thinking of the mind as bound in=20
physical space with ideas that grow exponentially into them.
>

>Maybe... the self-birthing (ha ha ha ha ha) process that I call my evolving
>consciousness stops when entropy kills its physical substrate? (Sorry for
>this downer image: I'm developing moles and a flabby stomach.) ...Like
>Complex Order self-organises and propagates in the physical universe, until
>entropy caps its progress?

Only I know the truth. You are a 19 yr old glamour model who=20
cannot resist a man with a bulging library.

Tony Hindle.
=46rom nothing came complexity and entropy and their interaction.
Complexity, entropy and their interaction is nothing.