Re: virus: Axioms

Tadeusz Niwinski (tad@teta.ai)
Mon, 17 Mar 1997 15:19:27 -0800

Tim wrote:
>On Sun, 16 Mar 1997, Tadeusz Niwinski wrote:
>> Tim wrote:
>> >Now, David, why can't other axioms/philosophies have validity as well.
>> >Validity isn't a limited resource. It doesn't decrease Objectivism for
>> >other systems to be as valid, to other individuals with other axioms.
>>
>> What *are* the other axioms? Can we put them together and compare?
>
>Axiom One: Axiomatic systems are limiting and imprecise.
>Axiom Two: See axiom #1

Great start. Here is another good axiom to try:

Axiom W: Words are limiting and imprecise.

Let's implement it:

asd dfgdf fgkj klllgf dfhgsdfg dfgf gdfgf uck u ggo
Fddd aaa ddd bhgjt m,,,\ qwe poi lkjasd .

The quality of our communication is almost the same :-)

Do you think, Tim, your axioms will "do us any good" or "is this just
pissing in the wind?"

Regards, Tadeusz (Tad) Niwinski from planet TeTa
tad@teta.ai http://www.teta.ai (604) 985-4159