> Clearly, this is an interesting and useful means of analyzing
> behaviour; I am, however, not sure if its really meaningful in the
> context of the current discussion. One can have `free will' in this
> cybernetic sense and the inquirers after `free will' in the more
> common one will vigorously argue the position.
Which definition has a more common sense? I would claim that mine
does a better job of predicting how the "common folk" would categorize
things into those with free will and those without.
-- David McFadzean david@lucifer.com Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/ Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/