>Its challenge that makes more of a man of ya, Martz. :)
But I want to be a WOMAN! I'm a lesbian trapped in a mans body.
>> One thing I think I should mention at this point. I mentioned that I
>> thought any communication could be broken down *recursively* into the
>> three steps (..to heaven. Shit. I can't get that tune outta my head).
>
>I'm not absolutely sure that its absolutely reductible more than a cycle
>or two down but in general, I'll agree. Provisionally. :)
We haven't got the knowledge yet, but theoretically I think it can be
done (I think it's obvious but I'm always wary of things that seem
obvious).
>I'm not sure /how/ meme-meme interactions are really
>accomplished; at that level we're already so far away from `the
>hardware' (the headware?) that I'm not sure its /meaningful/ to discuss
>meme-meme protocol beyond to say `yes, it happens, yes it can probably
>fail but typically doesn't.' We have experience of
>memesphere-memesphere communication, but meme-meme requires so much of
>the model at present ...
Give us time though. We're pretty good at finding answers once we start
asking questions.
>I'm fairly sure than inter and intra memespheric communication take
>largely different communication rules into account, for no other reason
>that intermemespheric communication has had /millinea/ to be worked on,
>intramemespheric communication is a relatice /blip/ in comparison.
How many millenia? What sort of time period do you reckon separates the
two events? Is it enough for evolution to have made a jot of difference?
I see the two happening at around the same time so I'm not convinced.
-- Martz martz@martz.demon.co.ukFor my public key, <mailto:m.traynor@ic.ac.uk> with 'Send public key' as subject an automated reply will follow.
No more random quotes.