Re: virus: Technology (was manifest science)
Joe E. Dees (email@example.com)
Sun, 6 Jun 1999 21:15:20 -0500
Date sent: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 14:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dylan Durst <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: virus: Technology (was manifest science)
Send reply to: email@example.com
> > > control, depression), I'm curious to know what is below us on the stack.
> > > Agreed. But that still does not awnser my question. You are looking at
> > > what is on top of our 'conscious' minds (all the details, breath, motor
> > > What our recursive minds are subproblems of.
> > Once something becomes routine with us we lose awareness of it;
> ... fodder snipped ...
> > processes but our goals
> Joe, you have once again not awnsered my question. I'm not talking what
> is on top of us in the stack (all of our sub problems, 'moving the
> forearm'), but what is below our consciousness. To assume that we at at the
> top of the pyramid/stack is strange.
I answered your question. What is ontogenetically below our
individual human consciousnesses, and supports and grounds
them, are cognitive processes of which we are experientially
unaware. What is phylogenetically below human consciousness
per se is the consciousness achieved by other terrestrial life forms.
> - dylan
> - - -
> Dylan Durst # firstname.lastname@example.org # email@example.com # firstname.lastname@example.org
> http://www.porter.ucsc.edu/~dsd # <-<--<---<----<----|---->---->--->-->->