At 11:21 AM 29/05/99 -0500, Brett wrote:
>What is wrong with the example provided by <medicine> (the technology
>for replicating "medicine" the idea) as this might be contrasted from
>available for modification and also replicable as a distinct entity (a
>such, we might also say that the technology of medicine necessitates
The only thing in this universe that "necessitates" replication is the unavoidable process of evolution. Sorry, Brett, your logic is impenetrable to me. I suggest you give copious examples and analogies of your ideas regarding the dynamics of <medicine>, couched in everyday terms that the intended recipients are familiar with, and pay particular attention to causality. Anything less would be doing a disservice to your (assumed) goal of spreading your ideas.