>rape for the purpose of sex = inhumane slaughter for the purpose of food
>That's all I said! Those are two fundamentally *good* things
No. No. No.
Rape is never for the purpose of sex.
It is _not_ a *good* thing.
Fundamental or otherwise.
The fact you have chosen to pass over the rape usage to achieve your explanation for the 'inhumaneness' of using animals for food is, IMHO, specious and improper.