From: "psypher" <overload@fastmail.ca> Subject: Re: virus: Will and Force ? To: virus@lucifer.com Date sent: Thu, 20 May 1999 22:55:52 -0400 (EDT) Send reply to: virus@lucifer.com
> 
No, I got your point and rejected it.  You stated that a gump's 
contributions were AS important to the species as a whole as 
those I mentioned; I, quite correctly, maintain not.  Of course 
magnanimity is positive, but a real-life Forrest Gump's contributions 
are not on the same level as those of a Nelson Mandela (himself a 
lawyer) or a Vaclev Havel (philosopher, novelist and playwright).  
Contrary to the desires of some leveling equalizers, some people's 
contributions ARE INDEED more important to the species as a 
whole than those of others, and I listed some of the more important 
ones.  BTW, Gandhi earned a Doctorate of Law and Tutu a 
Doctorate of Divinity.  Mother Theresa was a figurehead who 
accepted money from Haiti's Baby Doc Duvalier and fomented antiabortion
 violence in the US (Quote: "If you want peace, fight 
against abortion.") in obesiance to the hardline Pope John Paul II 
has hewn.
>
> ...again, you have missed the point entirely. You have cited a list 
> of [admittedly valuable and impressive] contributions to humyn 
> understanding.
> ...someone who doesn't know squat about any of the things you list 
> but has a knack for communicating with children, say, can make a 
> phenomenal, lasting and valuable contribution to the species, to an 
> individual, to the world at large.
> ...I had hoped to avoid stooping to citing obvious and trite 
> examples, but I doubt very much whether Mohandas Gandhi, Mother 
> Theresa, Archbishop Desmond Tutu or any of a countless number of well-
> known contributors to the social whole. I know for certain that any 
> number of people never written about in the history books, never 
> trained in academic disciplines and never cited in peer-reviewed 
> publications have made vast and hugely significant contributions in 
> all sorts of areas.
> ...a person with an 80 IQ or whatever other packaged and quantified 
> aspect of consciousness you care to name can act as teacher, mentor 
> or inspiration.
> ...you obviously have a disciplined and well-ordered mind, why do you 
> feel the need to raise your amply demonstrated capacities above those 
> of other people?
> 
> -psypher
>  
> > Forrest Gump might be a "good guy", but it's highly unlikely that a 
> > real gump (lacking gumption) would have such a life, or would 
> > develop the calculus (integral or differential), or relativity 
> theory
> > (special or general), or complexity theory, or the uncertainty 
> > principle, or the undecideability theorems I or II, or fuzzy logic,
> > or phenomenology, or structuralism, or genetic epistemology, or 
> > hermeneutics, or semiotics, or memetics, any of which contribute 
> > substantially more to the species as a whole than any chocolate 
> > box park bench "philosophizing" by a kind and good-natured nitwit.  
> > I mentioned my experience with the test to show that I knew 
> > whereof I spoke concerning it.  Your need to engage in sour 
> > grapish reverse snobbery about it in your response speaks volumes.
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
>   http://fastmail.ca    Fastmail's Free web based email for Canadians
>