Re:Favorite sci-fi author?
« Reply #15 on: 2002-07-22 18:25:06 »
For a while in my 20s Moorcock was my favourite writer, the Jerry Cornelius stuff and Dancers at the end of time. I have well thumbed copy of Byzantium Endures and the sequel Laughter of Carthage, but my favourite non-sci-fi (if you can call any of it sci-fi) is Mother London. Following a group of London based schizophrenics from the War to the 1980s. they were regularly hospitalised for hearing voices but the twist was that they WERE hearing voices, as result of all being mildly telepathic. The best scene was when some of the central characters went to a festival where everyone including themselves were dropping acid, the voices got seriously strange then.
For me, it's Frank Herbert. Hands down. His portrayal of some of the possibilities of human evolution and genetic engineering really startled me into thinking. He's by far the sci-fi author who has made the greatest impact on my thinking.
I have immense respect for Herbert, Zelazny, Disch, Spinrad, Ballard, Aldiss, Simak, Budrys, Silverberg, Leiber, Bester, Farmer, Sturgeon, Heinlein, Bradbury, Clarke, Dick and Lem, but my all-time favorite is Harlan Ellison, who did not write novels, but who has won more Hugos and Nebulas for his passionate, erudite and meticulously crafted short stories than any other speculative fiction writer in the history of the genre. DEATHBIRD STORIES, his monumental collection of connected short stories concerning contemporary godfoms, is a modern classic. To quote from its introduction:
Harlan Ellison * Deathbird Stories * (Book Quote) Introduction: Oblations at Alien Altars / xiv
~ " Gods can do anything. They fear nothing: they are gods. But there is one rule, one Seal of Solomon that can confound a god, and to which all gods pay service, to the letter: When belief in a god dies, the god dies. When the last acolyte renounces his faith and turns to another deity, the god ceases to be. They know the terrible simplicity of that truth, the mightiest and the mingiest of gods. They have seen their fellow gods go down to obscurity and banishment for lack of believers. They saw Acetous wither when the cornucopia was ripped from his head by Hercules; they saw the twelve Aesir and their Agrarian heaven-home turned to mist when the Vikings took up the cross; they saw Harriman dwindle and die when the ancient Persian empire was overrun; they saw Algoma Naomi, the "Mother of Mind," lost to men when the Conquistadors brutalized the Mayan religion; they saw Ama-Terasu, the Japanese sun goddess, go up in a nova of light brighter then the sun from which she took her name, on a special day in Hiroshima; and Amen-Ra, and Anaitis, and Anath, and Anshar (and Kishar), and Anu, and Anubis, and Apollo... all of them shimmered and became insubstantial as their temples were replaced by rubble. Volume after volume of sacred books of gods. And that's only the "A's." As the time passes for men and women, so does it pass for gods, for they are made viable and substantial only through the massed beliefs of masses of men and women. And when puny mortals no longer worship at their altars, the gods die. " ~
In addition, he shined as a story selector and editor; his two collections of others' stories, DANGEROUS VISIONS and AGAIN, DANGEROUS VISIONS have never been surpassed.
My vote was 'other' for Michael Moorcock. My favorite since age 11 (now 25). Astounding stuff really, especially taken as a whole. I just re-read my entire collection of some 50-odd books and the effect was amazing. A very interesting perspective-building experience.
Re:Favorite sci-fi author?
« Reply #22 on: 2003-01-13 08:55:55 »
I though Byzantium Endures was good. I haven't read The Laughter of Carthage or Mother London as yet.
Have just read Solaris and was unimpressed; a rare case where the film version was much better. The novel does address some of the themes more fully (particularly suicide), but suffers from being rather excessively discusive; in places it reads as a tract, not a novel.
Re:Favorite sci-fi author?
« Reply #23 on: 2003-01-13 09:37:36 »
Kharin,
Which screen adaptation of Solaris did you see? The Russian version, or the more recent US version?
I ask because I've seen the Russian version and thougth it to be very true to the novel, and quite good. However, I've not seen the US version. Is it worth seeing?
Re:Favorite sci-fi author?
« Reply #24 on: 2003-01-13 15:19:20 »
Casey,
It's the Tarkovsky version I've seen. You're quite right that it's quite faithful to the original (the descriptions of the planet, Kelvin's father and Rheya's suicide differ I suppose, and Tarkovsky rearranged some of the order of events - largely for the better), it's just the prose style of the translation I read that I didn't care for.
Regarding the Soderbergh version, I was expected a dumbing down version, but I'm told that it's a quite restrained affair - which might explain why it hasn't done very well. Hence I have not been able to see it since no cinema near where I live has screened it.