Starving a Nation: From the World's Largest Concentration Camp

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
2024-04-16 00:53:59 CoV Wiki
Learn more about the Church of Virus

News: Open for business: The CoV Store!

  Church of Virus BBS
  General
  Serious Business
  Starving a Nation: From the World's Largest Concentration Camp

_{« previous} _{next »}

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10

Author

Topic: Starving a Nation: From the World's Largest Concentration Camp (Read 14703 times)

Hermit
Archon

Posts: 4287
Reputation: 8.94
Rate Hermit

Prime example of a practically perfect person

Re:Starving a Nation: From the World's Largest Concentration Camp
« Reply #45 on: 2009-01-09 11:05:00 »

Why do they hate the West so much, we will ask

[ Hermit : In my opinion, and in the opinion of many of his fellow journalists, Robert Fisk is the world's preeminent Middle East journalist. Here he does a nice job of filling in the background to the horror being inflicted on the Palestinians. I think he does a fair job of extracting meaning from statistics.

Speaking of horror, thank-you very much Blunderov, for the link to the "Total Horrorshow" above. I used not to be sure about anything but the very occasional use of such images, as people tend to become very good at suppressing empathy when exposed to that level of slaughter on anything approaching a regular basis. Which of course goes some way to explaining why repression of this particularly brutal nature leads to resistance which most would regard as horrific.

Worth remembering as we look at these images, no matter what we are told by Israel and its amen chorus in the conventional media and thoroughly purchased Western politicians, just because a policeman wears a Hamas uniform doesn't mean that he doesn't train as a paramedic; to suppress crime; to protect the innocent; to maintain civil order; to direct traffic and to be a thinking, breathing, caring human being. Turning such a person into a screaming lump of shredded meat lying in the midst of the disassembled gory wreckage of his murdered colleagues does not make the world a better place for anyone - even when it is done by the Israelis with all the best rationalizations and propaganda in the world. Most people can intuit this when they see such images. Which is why Israel is going to extreme lengths to attempt to prevent it and why I think that the publication of these images is appropriate.

Read and weep.]

Source: The Independent
Authors: Robert Fisk
Dated: 2009-01-07

So once again, Israel has opened the gates of hell to the Palestinians. Forty civilian refugees dead in a United Nations school, three more in another. Not bad for a night's work in Gaza by the army that believes in "purity of arms". But why should we be surprised?

Have we forgotten the 17,500 dead – almost all civilians, most of them children and women – in Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon; the 1,700 Palestinian civilian dead in the Sabra-Chatila massacre; the 1996 Qana massacre of 106 Lebanese civilian refugees, more than half of them children, at a UN base; the massacre of the Marwahin refugees who were ordered from their homes by the Israelis in 2006 then slaughtered by an Israeli helicopter crew; the 1,000 dead of that same 2006 bombardment and Lebanese invasion, almost all of them civilians?

What is amazing is that so many Western leaders, so many presidents and prime ministers and, I fear, so many editors and journalists, bought the old lie; that Israelis take such great care to avoid civilian casualties. "Israel makes every possible effort to avoid civilian casualties," yet another Israeli ambassador said only hours before the Gaza massacre. And every president and prime minister who repeated this mendacity as an excuse to avoid a ceasefire has the blood of last night's butchery on their hands. Had George Bush had the courage to demand an immediate ceasefire 48 hours earlier, those 40 civilians, the old and the women and children, would be alive.

What happened was not just shameful. It was a disgrace. Would war crime be too strong a description? For that is what we would call this atrocity if it had been committed by Hamas. So a war crime, I'm afraid, it was. After covering so many mass murders by the armies of the Middle East – by Syrian troops, by Iraqi troops, by Iranian troops, by Israeli troops – I suppose cynicism should be my reaction. But Israel claims it is fighting our war against "international terror". The Israelis claim they are fighting in Gaza for us, for our Western ideals, for our security, for our safety, by our standards. And so we are also complicit in the savagery now being visited upon Gaza.

I've reported the excuses the Israeli army has served up in the past for these outrages. Since they may well be reheated in the coming hours, here are some of them: that the Palestinians killed their own refugees, that the Palestinians dug up bodies from cemeteries and planted them in the ruins, that ultimately the Palestinians are to blame because they supported an armed faction, or because armed Palestinians deliberately used the innocent refugees as cover.

The Sabra and Chatila massacre was committed by Israel's right-wing Lebanese Phalangist allies while Israeli troops, as Israel's own commission of inquiry revealed, watched for 48 hours and did nothing. When Israel was blamed, Menachem Begin's government accused the world of a blood libel. After Israeli artillery had fired shells into the UN base at Qana in 1996, the Israelis claimed that Hizbollah gunmen were also sheltering in the base. It was a lie. The more than 1,000 dead of 2006 – a war started when Hizbollah captured two Israeli soldiers on the border – were simply dismissed as the responsibility of the Hizbollah. Israel claimed the bodies of children killed in a second Qana massacre may have been taken from a graveyard. It was another lie. The Marwahin massacre was never excused. The people of the village were ordered to flee, obeyed Israeli orders and were then attacked by an Israeli gunship. The refugees took their children and stood them around the truck in which they were travelling so that Israeli pilots would see they were innocents. Then the Israeli helicopter mowed them down at close range. Only two survived, by playing dead. Israel didn't even apologise.

Twelve years earlier, another Israeli helicopter attacked an ambulance carrying civilians from a neighbouring village – again after they were ordered to leave by Israel – and killed three children and two women. The Israelis claimed that a Hizbollah fighter was in the ambulance. It was untrue. I covered all these atrocities, I investigated them all, talked to the survivors. So did a number of my colleagues. Our fate, of course, was that most slanderous of libels: we were accused of being anti-Semitic.

And I write the following without the slightest doubt: we'll hear all these scandalous fabrications again. We'll have the Hamas-to-blame lie – heaven knows, there is enough to blame them for without adding this crime – and we may well have the bodies-from-the-cemetery lie and we'll almost certainly have the Hamas-was-in-the-UN-school lie [ Hermit : Which we did, and this time at least, it was shown to be a lie. ] and we will very definitely have the anti-Semitism lie. And our leaders will huff and puff and remind the world that Hamas originally broke the ceasefire. It didn't. Israel broke it, first on 4 November when its bombardment killed six Palestinians in Gaza and again on 17 November when another bombardment killed four more Palestinians. Not forgetting that a blockade - which has been in place for three yearsto starve the Palestinians into submission - is an act of war, so in fact the ceasefire was very unidirectional. ]

Yes, Israelis deserve security. Twenty Israelis dead in 10 years around Gaza is a grim figure indeed. But 600 Palestinians dead in just over a week, thousands over the years since 1948 – when the Israeli massacre at Deir Yassin helped to kick-start the flight of Palestinians from that part of Palestine that was to become Israel – is on a quite different scale. This recalls not a normal Middle East bloodletting but an atrocity on the level of the Balkan wars of the 1990s. And of course, when an Arab bestirs himself with unrestrained fury and takes out his incendiary, blind anger on the West, we will say it has nothing to do with us. Why do they hate us, we will ask? But let us not say we do not know the answer.

« Last Edit: 2009-01-09 11:09:03 by Hermit »