rhinoceros
Archon
Gender: 
Posts: 1318
Reputation: 8.38
Rate rhinoceros
My point is ...
  
|
 |
Evolution and Learning: Baldwin Effect Reconsidered
« on: 2004-08-13 22:27:52 » |
 |
I found a new article with a review of a book on the Baldwin Effect. The "Baldwin Effect", which was proposed by J. Mark Baldwin 100 years ago, has been coming up again and again in discussions of Evolution. Many evolutionists reject it while others (notably Daniel Dennett) have been arguing for it in one form or other.
The effect sounds like a kind of Lamarckism. Lamarck, unlike Darwin, supported that traits which are acquired (learned) during one's lifetime could be inherited (for example, the giraffe stretched her neck to reach the high branches, her neck was extended a bit and, as a result, her children had longer necks). Of course, this was simply false. There is no genetic mechanism for anything like that. Our ways of evolution are only two: (a) random mutations and natural selection by means of survival and (b) genetic recombination by means of sexual selection.
Now, the Baldwin Effect is a kind of "Darwinian Lamarckism" (pardon me the expression): In a given culture which favors certain acquired/learned traits, those who have the genetic capability and inclination to develop these traits are sexually selected. As a result, evolution is accelerated a lot, as simulations have shown.
Imagine for example a society where technological and other factors have made it so that nerds have a high status, higher than bodybuilders. Those who have the genetic capability/predisposition to become nerds easier than others will go to school, learn what it takes, and get both the money and the girl.
I talked too much. Here is the article.
Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered
http://human-nature.com/ep/reviews/ep02105107.html
|
Author
Logged
