With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. - Steven Weinberg, 1999
Re:Precious. Conservative Values Exposed :-) John McCain Called his wife a what?
« Reply #1 on: 2008-06-19 21:20:15 »
I really don't see any reason why "cunt" is considered SUCH a horrible word. If it is, why isn't there an analogously SO horrible word for male genetalia or a male himself? I'm obviously no fan of John McCain, but if the short dickbrain wants to call his wife a "cunt", I've got no problem with it. Give the crazy shithead a break for christsakes.
I really don't see any reason why "cunt" is considered SUCH a horrible word. If it is, why isn't there an analogously SO horrible word for male genetalia or a male himself? I'm obviously no fan of John McCain, but if the short dickbrain wants to call his wife a "cunt", I've got no problem with it. Give the crazy shithead a break for christsakes.
Well by-fucking-gawd, if there's no male equivalent to cunt in the ol' semantic toolbox, then let's make one up.
I vote for "mancunt", seeing as we already have "mantitties" in the toolbo........
AHAH!!
"Tool"!
Maybe THAT is the equivalent.
Nevermind.
The only time I ever hear that used is male-on-male.
Re:Precious. Conservative Values Exposed :-) John McCain Called his wife a what?
« Reply #3 on: 2008-06-19 23:39:48 »
Would I care? Mo and Walter know that one word is as good as another and the "shock and horror," or more likely, pseudo "shock and horror" at particular words is purely a consequence of faulty thinking on the part of the listener. Offense cannot be given, only taken.
That said and done, most Republicans and not a few Democrats seem to suffer from this class of faulty thinking. Faulty thinking that has resulted in the ridiculous situation where we have George Carlin's "Seven Words," the FCC fining broadcasters, mother Grundy wandering around this poor country having people arrested for "obscene" language, the whole nine-yards. As McSame purports to represent this "Family Values" BS, he should be held to the same standard as he supposedly represents. If he rejects this standard and is still supported by the Republican political Mchicanery, then there is no reason or excuse to continue with the charade.
Then Janet Jackson would be free to express her nipples on prime time TV, and nobody should care except possibly from an aesthetics perspective (I haven't seen her nipples, so this ought not to be construed as a comment upon them). Now wouldn't that be a wonderful world? As a consequence, the only slack I recommend cutting John McSame is sufficient to get a noose around his neck as we line up the supporters of the Bush War for Nuremberg II.
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. - Steven Weinberg, 1999
Author
Logged
