Should the CoV endorse the Proactionary Principle (version 1.0)?
yes	41.76	(42.88%)
no	55.62	(57.12%)
decisiveness		(13.86%)
unvoted equity		(2.61%)
voted equity		(97.39%)
28 Voters: JerryLee, outlawpoet, David Lucifer, rhinoceros, Ophis, Walter Watts, prometheus, DrSebby, Kid-A, Rhysenn, the.bricoleur, Matt Arnold, Heretician, MoEnzyme, Casey, Alex Future Bokov, ElvenSage, Sat, Drakeo Vortex, chippedlogic, Pabreetzio, simul, Hermit, pickler, goomba, deusdiabolus, teh, Bohandez,
voter	voted for	comment
outlawpoet	yes	no comment
JerryLee	yes	no comment
David Lucifer	yes	We have to fight the precautionary principle
rhinoceros	no	Solid science rather than popular perception is commendable but the EXI article is stereotyping a new hysterics using lots of strawmen. To whom is it addressed? Is paying for specific damages included in the risk assessment, and who can guarantee it?
Ophis	yes	no comment
Walter Watts	private	no comment
prometheus	yes	no comment
DrSebby	private	no comment
Kid-A	no	no comment
Rhysenn	private	no comment
the.bricoleur	private	no comment
Matt Arnold	yes	no comment
Heretician	private	no comment
MoEnzyme	yes	a tentative yes. . . I would like some discussion before a final endorsement.
Casey	private	no comment
Alex Future Bokov	yes	no comment
ElvenSage	yes	I'm voting yes after reading it, but I think things like this should be discussed.
Sat	private	no comment
Drakeo Vortex	private	no comment
chippedlogic	no	science, technology, engineering, and enlightenments when tamed by institution result in nullification of potential.
Pabreetzio	yes	no comment
simul	no	it's radical dogma thinly disguised as logic. precautionary and proactionary are both extreme viewpoints
Hermit	no	Science should not go surfing down a slippery slope or allow others to remove the snow boards. Science and the CoV should try to be reasonable. Being reasonable means avoiding the establishment of such rules and evaluating actual situations as they arise.
pickler	private	more discussion required
goomba	yes	it is general enough to be harmless, so why not
deusdiabolus	no	progress requires risk.
teh	private	no comment
Bohandez	yes	no comment