logo Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
2019-10-17 09:50:55 CoV Wiki
Learn more about the Church of Virus
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Do you want to know where you stand?

Is evolution a fact?

What is your stance on the statement that every living organism on earth today(including humans) has evolved from very simple lifeforms that lived billions of years ago.

It is necessarily true.0.01 (0.03%)
The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.22.39 (99.70%)
It is probably true.0.06 (0.26%)
I don't know.0.00 (0.00%)
It is probably not true.0.00 (0.00%)
The overwhelming evidence contradicts it.0.00 (0.00%)
It is impossible.0.00 (0.01%)

decisiveness (22.33%)
unvoted equity (77.54%)
voted equity (22.46%)

67 Voters: Kid-A, David Lucifer, JerryLee, ElvenSage, goomba, Joe Dees, rhinoceros, JD, DrSebby, Ophis, Kalkor, Sat, Cassidy McGurk, Walter Watts, prometheus, Hermit, Lukian The Wizard, Drakeo Vortex, referent, Hermitess, Flux, MoEnzyme, nrv8, outlawpoet, Tywick, Blunderov, Kharin, Feagwath, Rhysenn, RavenBlack, opsima, the.bricoleur, Warlock, Smucker, RenegadeSocial, alahzred, lotusfox, Mermaid, Casey, Wonko, se7en, michelle, simul, Aryn Ravenlocke, metahuman, Galt, Gunit, Nikolai, Atheist Crusader, LenKen, Matt Arnold, Heretician, Alex Future Bokov, DJ dAndroid, Cydonia, subdermal, chippedlogic, Pabreetzio, Azareph, Jorrit, pickler, archangelsin, Fox, teh, deusdiabolus, ObfuscatoryAlias, Bohandez,
votervoted forcomment
David Luciferprivateno comment
Mermaidprivateno comment
JDThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
CaseyThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
WonkoIt is necessarily true.
It is the only thinkable way life could have started. Even if you count gods in, as they must have somehow started too. I wonder why this simple logic is not wider known.
se7enprivateno comment
michelleThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
Lukian The WizardIt is probably true.
Evidence goes both ways, the Xian evidence is a shocker
MoEnzymeThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
of course.
simulThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
Checkboxes ARGH! http://www.electionmethods.org/ http://www.approvalvoting.org/
Aryn Ravenlockeprivateno comment
metahumanThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
Evolution is observable.
GaltIt is necessarily true.
no comment
DrSebbyIt is necessarily true.
since in theory nothing can be "absolutely proven" outside of simple math, i feel that is just a linguistic glitch. while i cant "prove" that the sun is a ball of burning gas, there is no remaining alternate solution that even comes close to being reason
NikolaiIt is necessarily true.
Whether or not what we think about evolutionary history is correct, evolution is something that we can actively observe happening. It is possible that our observations are wrong, but the chance is so slim that it makes no odds.
Atheist Crusaderprivateno comment
LenKenThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
Microevolution can be seen in action with viruses, such as HIV, so itís an empirically verifiable fact. And macroevolution is overwhelmingly probable, considering the evidence from the fossil record and modern genetics.
Matt ArnoldThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
Joe DeesThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
Drakeo VortexThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
JerryLeeThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
Hereticianprivateno comment
Alex Future BokovThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
DJ dAndroidThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
CydoniaIt is probably true.
Nothing is fact. There is overwhelming evidence, but I would feel uneasy calling it a fact.
subdermalThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
chippedlogicIt is necessarily true.
no comment
HermitIt is probably true.
What is the limit for "living organism"? If it involves DNA then "overwhelming evidence" would be more appropriate. But what of virii and prions? They all may not have instantiated 10^9 + years ago.
PabreetzioIt is necessarily true.
I find it a fundamental principle as much as gravity.
AzarephThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
Nothing should be considered "necessarily true"
Jorritprivateno comment
picklerThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
archangelsinI don't know.
no comment
FoxIt is probably true.
The plausibility given to evolution in both theory and with what we see and experience is very hard to dismiss. I for one am in favor with it's logical suggestibility, based on observation.
tehThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
deusdiabolusIt is probably true.
no comment
ObfuscatoryAliasThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment
BohandezThe overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.
no comment

Your vote will count for something when you join the reputation system

Vote on this issue

Return to vote index


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Church of Virus BBS | Powered by YaBB SE
© 2001-2002, YaBB SE Dev Team. All Rights Reserved.

Please support the CoV.
Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS! RSS feed